NEWS channel RT has suggested that Ofcom would need to look at the BBC too if the regulator is to take the Kremlin-backed broadcaster to task over “state sponsorship”.
Ofcom has been told by the Culture Secretary to review the operation of RT – previously known as Russia Today – which she said was “demonstrably part of Russia’s global disinformation campaign”.
But RT has responded, accusing the Government of a “hypocritical” stance after ministers criticised China’s decision to ban the BBC World Service last year.
READ MORE: Russia Today ban: Nicola Sturgeon blasts Alex Salmond over ties to station
It comes after Tory MP for High Peak Robert Largan warned that he would be “cautious” about banning RT due to potential reprisals against the BBC.
He said on Twitter: “Putin would respond by banning the BBC in Russia, which actually cuts through his propaganda to millions.”
He suggested RT was mostly ignored by those in the UK.
In her letter to Ofcom, Nadine Dorries (below) said certain states sought to “exploit and undermine” the UK’s media landscape.
She said RT’s editor-in-chief had “made clear in the past” that the station supported the Kremlin’s aims, by calling the broadcaster an “information weapon” of the Russian state.
Dorries said: “It is essential that the UK looks to limit Russia’s ability to spread their propaganda at home.
“I have concerns that broadcasters such as RT, whom Ofcom have found to have repeatedly breached the Broadcasting Code in the past, will also look to spread harmful disinformation about the ongoing crisis in Ukraine here in the UK.”
She said this was “something RT has previously done in its biased reporting of the Salisbury poisonings and the conflict in Syria”.
Dorries said that although it was a matter for Ofcom to rule on, due to the regulator’s independence, she welcomed comments suggesting complaints were being taken seriously, and said: “I call on you to ensure your actions are timely and transparent to reassure the British public.”
In a response, Ofcom chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes told Dorries the regulator had “already stepped up our oversight of coverage of these events by broadcasters in the UK”.
She said while broadcasters can cover issues from a “particular perspective” as long as balance is achieved, that “it would not be acceptable for any of our licensees to broadcast one-sided propaganda”.
The move was branded “hypocritical” by RT reporter Shadia Edwards-Dashti.
Speaking on the news channel, she said it was “simply not good enough for the Government” that Ofcom was keeping an eye on RT and instead “the Government wants to see this channel taken off air”.
She said it was a “slippery slope, specifically about freedom of speech”, and added: “Is this an issue of state sponsorship? Because if it is an issue of state sponsorship, then we have to look at the BBC – that too is sponsored by the state.”
She said: “Just to mention, last year when China banned the BBC World Service, that was early last year in 2021, the UK Government slammed that move as an unacceptable curtailing of media freedom.
“They were the headlines at the time, so it does seem somewhat hypocritical at this point.”
Downing Street said Ofcom had been asked to keep a “watchful eye” on RT.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesperson said it was Ofcom’s role to regulate the media and “that’s not something we would want to see politicians decide”.
Asked whether Boris Johnson would advise his father not to appear again on the channel, the spokesman said: “Obviously that’s a matter for individuals who appear to make that decision.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson TWICE links Salmond to SNP in 'unacceptable' remarks
In the Commons, in response to a call from Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer for RT to be taken to task, Johnson said: “We live in a democracy, Mr Speaker, and we live in a country that believes in free speech and I think it’s important that we should leave it up to Ofcom rather than to politicians to decide which media organisations to ban.
“That’s what Russia does.”
Meanwhile, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said it is “unthinkable” that Alex Salmond still has a show on a Kremlin-backed broadcaster.
The former first minister launched his self-titled show on Russia Today (RT) in 2017, drawing the ire of many across Scottish political life – including his successor Sturgeon.
Earlier, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss told Sky News: “I think it is certainly true that (RT) is spouting propaganda on behalf of the Kremlin.”
In response to Starmer’s accusations on Tuesday, RT deputy editor-in-chief Anna Belkina said: “Always a joy to see Western and particularly British politicians finally drop their hypocritical disguise in favour of open interference in institutions they touted as supposedly totally independent and wholly free from political pressure and interference.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel