THE surging cost of living and bad weather could have been behind a fall in the number of people visiting stores, as footfall remains well behind levels seen before Covid-19 lockdowns, experts say.
Footfall fell by 17.5% in February compared to the same month in 2020, which is 1.3% worse than the month before – with Scotland seeing the steepest decline of all four nations in the United Kingdom.
David Lonsdale, director of the Scottish Retail Consortium (SRC), said it was an “underwhelming and disappointing performance” for Scotland’s stores.
Shopping centre footfall fell by 31.2% in February compared to 2020, which was better than the fall of 36.6% the month before and the first monthly improvement since autumn, SRC said.
Footfall in Glasgow dropped by 19% last month when compared to before the pandemic, 1.4% worse than in January.
Lonsdale said: “Concerns about the cost of living and even the bleak weather in the second half of the month could well have exerted a downward pressure on visits to shop stores.
“However, these figures do underline the protracted nature of the recovery and the need for concerted action and a more upbeat message from policy makers in the short-term to encourage and entice shoppers back.
“After all, much of our wider economy is ultimately dependent on what happens to consumer spending.”
But the UK is seeing the best rebounds in store footfall, leading the top five European markets.
Andy Sumpter, retail consultant for Sensormatic Solutions, said it suggests a “collective growing confidence among shoppers”.
He said: “With UK governments announcing the ending of Covid restrictions, this represents what many, not least retailers, hope is the ‘beginning of the end’ of the crisis.
“Our latest data shows consumer concern about in-store safety fell by18 percentage points year-on-year – however, shoppers now face new and growing pressures.
“The cost of living squeeze and inflation, and a volatile macroeconomic and geopolitical climate could create a perfect storm of uncertainty for consumers, which could still impact the long-term retail recovery as it looks to build back post-pandemic.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel