A REPORT by the BBC's former Scotland editor, Sarah Smith, about Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon breached broadcasting rules, Ofcom has said.
The broadcasting regulator stated in a ruling issued on Monday that the BBC had made a “significant mistake” which it failed to acknowledge or correct on air.
The mistake came after Smith reported that Salmond, now the leader of Alba, had said Sturgeon should resign as First Minister.
In fact, he had not done so.
In her report on February 26, 2021, Smith said: “Alex Salmond said he believes Nicola Sturgeon has misled Parliament and broken the Ministerial Code, which he thinks means she should resign [Ofcom’s emphasis]”.
However, while Salmond had told a Holyrood committee looking at the handling of harassment complaints that he thought Sturgeon had broken the ministerial code, he said it was not for him to name what the consequences of that should be.
Ofcom said the BBC had broken rule 5.1 and 5.2 in its report of his comments.
These rules are:
- Rule 5.1: “News, in whatever form, must be reported with due accuracy and presented with due impartiality."
- Rule 5.2: “Significant mistakes in news should normally be acknowledged and corrected on air quickly. Corrections should be appropriately scheduled."
Ofcom’s report said that the BBC accepted it had breached rule 5.1, but insisted it had not broken 5.2 as “appropriate action to mitigate the error” had been taken.
The BBC further argued that the mistake had not been sufficiently significant to warrant an on-air correction.
The corporation said it had offered corrections on Twitter and on its website, but argued that the inaccuracy did not “rise to the level of significance which would require a broadcast correction”.
1. On the 6 o’clock news headline tonight I said that Alex Salmond had claimed the First Minister had ‘broken the ministerial code and that he thinks she should resign’. I would like to clarify that Mr Salmond did not say that the First Minister should resign.
— sarah smith (@BBCsarahsmith) February 26, 2021
Ordinarily, an inaccurate broadcast would require a correction to be sent out at a time when it was likely to reach a similar audience.
In May 2021, the BBC threw out hundreds of complaints which had been made about Smith's inaccurate report.
Ofcom said that the proximity of the inaccurate report to the Scottish Parliament elections affected its significance, but the BBC questioned where in Ofcom’s rules this was written.
A BBC spokesperson ultimately said the corporation accepted the decision.
READ MORE: BBC's Scotland editor apologises after saying Alex Salmond wants FM to resign
"We are absolutely committed to transparency around complaints and we always seek to correct any issues as swiftly as possible," they said.
"We will reflect on the findings and of course if there is more we can do to explain how we make our judgements on complaints then we will look at that."
Smith took up a new post as the BBC's North America editor late last year, heading to the US to begin the job in February.
An independent report compiled by James Hamilton and released the month after Smith's inaccurate report found that Sturgeon had not breached the ministerial code.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel