THE Labour Party, Westminster’s Houses of Parliament, HMRC, and energy regulator Ofgem are just a few of the organisations which have had their “platitudes” on gender equality called out by an automated Twitter account.
The “bot” account (@paygapbot) uses data from the UK Government pay gap website, where employers with 250 or more employees have published figures comparing men and women’s average wages across the organisation.
It automatically responds with an organisation’s pay gap statistics to any post put out on Twitter hailing equality on International Women’s Day.
SNP MP Alison Thewliss said the account should help show that it is "deeds, not words" that matter.
READ MORE: Meet three Scots women leading the way in ‘man’s world’ jobs
In one example, Keir Starmer’s party wrote: “Labour is the party of equality.
“This #InternationalWomensDay, we acknowledge the bias and discrimination women continue to face in 2022 and recommit to their fight for equality.”
The bot responded: “In this organisation, women's median hourly pay is 4.1% lower than men's.”
In this organisation, women's median hourly pay is 4.1% lower than men's. https://t.co/lmhIgx0cMv
— Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 8, 2022
The House of Commons and the House of Lords also came under scrutiny from the bot, which revealed both have pay gaps that man women take home less on average.
The reported discrepancy is greater in the Lords (5.1% lower for women) than in the Commons (0.9% lower for women).
Other UK Government bodies fared worse than either of the Houses of Parliament.
HM Revenue and Customs wrote: “At HMRC we are proud to celebrate women in senior leadership, who have found great job prospects across the UK. #LevellingUp”
However, the bot revealed that women’s median hourly pay at HMRC is 8.8% lower than men’s.
Energy regulator Ofgem has a pay gap of 10.5%, while the Department for Education has a 4% gap, the bot said.
In this organisation, women's median hourly pay is 10.5% lower than men's. https://t.co/3xjYJrRfxR
— Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 8, 2022
The account, which has already accrued more than 200,000 followers since starting up in March 2021, says it aims to get organisations to “stop posting platitudes [and] start fixing the problem”.
The bot has also revealed that female staff at councils across the UK, and in NHS trusts, face taking home lower wages than men on average.
However, there are some organisations where this pattern does not hold true.
One such business is MOWI, a Scots firm that is the UK’s largest supplier of farm-raised salmon. In response to a tweet about International Women’s Day, the bot said: “In this organisation, men's and women's median hourly pay is equal.”
The same was true for the Scottish Government’s non-ministerial Registers of Scotland department.
In this organisation, men's and women's median hourly pay is equal. https://t.co/VMH9BiJJCG
— Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) March 8, 2022
Even rarer than equal pay were organisations such as The Disabilities Trust, a UK charity that pays women on average 1.4% more than men.
The SNP's shadow chancellor Alison Thewliss, who has shared some of the bot's posts, told The National: "On International Women's Day, organisations are always keen to talk about what they are doing for women. Much of that work is laudable, but we cannot forget that there are still persistent issues of inequality in society on every other day of the year.
"The gender pay gap bot account highlights very clearly how many of these same organisations have a lot of work to do to tackle long-standing issues like the pay gap. I hope this transparency focuses minds and encourages these organisations to take action. Deeds, not words."
You can click here to see the Twitter bot account, or find the UK Government's pay gap data here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel