JOHN Bercow has been branded a “serial liar” and a bully targeting “well-educated members of the establishment” by a House of Commons investigation.
The former Speaker should be banned from holding a pass to the Commons forever, the Independent Expert Panel (IEP) found after it upheld complaints by three members of parliamentary staff.
During his tenure, Bercow – a former Conservative MP thought now to be a member of the Labour Party – was known for allowing challenges to the Government’s Brexit agenda.
READ MORE: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to address MPs in House of Commons
The IEP upheld 21 out of 35 separate bullying allegations after following up findings by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and said his “behaviour fell very far below that which the public has a right to expect from any Member of Parliament”.
The nature of his expletive-ridden tirades against members of staff were so offensive, the panel recommended that were he still an MP, Bercow should be expelled from the Commons.
At one meeting in 2009, Bercow was alleged to have flown into a rage and was described as having “spittle coming out of [his] mouth” and waving his arms about.
In another incident, Bercow was accused of throwing his mobile phone at Angus Sinclair, a former senior member of Commons staff, who described the device as having “burst into hundreds of bits”. He added: “It was the most violent, extraordinary display of temper.”
READ MORE: Tory MP's wild minimum alcohol price claim debunked by new research
Kate Emms, a House of Commons employee, said Bercow had subjected her to “undermining and isolating behaviour” which the panel found to have “caused her to become seriously unwell through stress and anxiety”.
Stephen Irwin chaired the sub-panel of the IEP and said: “This was behaviour which had no place in any workplace.
“Members of staff in the House should not be expected to have to tolerate it as part of everyday life.”
He said Bercow’s evidence to the panel had been “widely unreliable and repeatedly dishonest”.
“He has attempted to defeat these complaints by false accusations of collusion and by advancing lies,” said Irwin.
READ MORE: Liz Truss confuses Greek foreign minister for pop star in social media shocker
The report added: “The findings of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, which we have upheld, show that the respondent has been a serial bully […]
“His evidence in the investigations, the findings of the Commissioner, and his submissions to us, show also that the respondent has been a serial liar.
“His behaviour fell very far below that which the public has a right to expect from any Member of Parliament.
“The respondent’s conduct was so serious that, had he still been a Member of Parliament, we would have determined that he should be expelled by resolution of the House. As it is, we recommend that he should never be permitted a pass to the Parliamentary estate.”
Bercow was accused of targeting Sinclair and Robert Rogers, Lord Lisvane because of his “rooted and prejudiced hostility to those who he perceived to be well-educated members of the establishment”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel