ALISTER Jack has been accused of “pathetic and patronising politicking” after he said Nicola Sturgeon’s comments regarding a no fly zone over Ukraine were “naive”.
The First Minister had said in a broadcast interview on Wednesday that a no fly zone over the besieged country should not be ruled out by Western leaders.
Sturgeon explained that although she “understands and shares” the concerns about direct military confrontation between Russia and NATO, a no fly zone and other options should be “considered on a daily basis”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon confirms indyref2 next year despite Ukraine invasion
On Thursday, Scotland Secretary Alister Jack called the FM’s comments “utterly irresponsible” and “completely naive” in an interview with the BBC.
The First Minister’s team were quick to counter the claims and said the Tory MP’s comments were “patronising”.
Speaking to the BBC, Jack was asked if a no fly zone was an option on the table.
He responded: “No. I think her remarks are utterly irresponsible.
“I think that they show total naivety to the situation. It is not something that is under review, we're very clear.
“I think her remarks are utterly irresponsible”
— Glenn Campbell (@GlennBBC) March 10, 2022
Scottish secretary, Alister Jack @ScotSecofState has strongly criticised FM @NicolaSturgeon for suggesting no fly zone over Ukraine should not be ruled out pic.twitter.com/6XiDWVJIbP
“At Cabinet on Tuesday, we had the Chief of Defence Staff presented to us. The Prime Minister, the Secretary of State for Defense are absolutely clear that we would not be creating or managing a no fly zone over Ukraine.”
Pressed on why a no fly zone wouldn’t be brought in despite that’s what Ukraine saying they need, Jack said that a NATO jet going into direct conflict with a Russian aircraft would escalate the conflict into “World War Three”.
“That simply is not going to happen,” he added.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford brands reports he's set to quit SNP chief role as 'total crap'
In response to the comments made by Jack, the First Minister’s spokesman said she was not advocating for a no-fly zone.
He said: “We are very well aware of what our partners have said about that.
“At the same time, the FM has made clear that going forward things have to be potentially on the table as the situation evolves.
“But we are not in any way blind to the risks of escalation which various people have talked about.
Jack said the FM's comments were "naive" and "irresponsible"
“You possibly heard the US Secretary of State [Antony Blinken] yesterday speaking about this in Washington and he was very clear, as indeed the Prime Minister and others have been, about the risk involved. So that’s the position.
“The FM is not calling for or advocating a no-fly zone.”
Asked about Jack’s comments about Sturgeon not understanding the situation, the FM’s spokesman was scathing.
He said: “I think that to indulge in that kind of politicking round this is pretty pathetic, to be honest. The issues here are of such a magnitude that I don’t think that kind of base politicking is not where we need to be.
READ MORE: Leslie Evans under fire from Finance Committee after refusing to appear before MSPs
“It sounds pretty patronising stuff from the Secretary of State and he should reflect on that.”
He denied Sturgeon being both against and open to a no-fly zone was a “muddle”.
On Wednesday, Sturgeon had said that Putin was “not acting in any way rationally or defensively”.
She added: “We have a situation right now, where perhaps the only thing nuclear weapons are deterring is the ability to properly and directly help Ukraine.
“So all of these things must be considered on a daily basis, right now, because we cannot, the world cannot stand by and watch Ukraine’s independence and sovereignty extinguish.
“That would be morally wrong from a Ukraine’s perspective, but the implications of that for the rest of us in terms of the values we hold dear would be severe too.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel