PATRICK Harvie has claimed Fergus Ewing used “right-wing language” by describing green policies as “extreme” in a row over oil and gas production in Scotland.
The Scottish Greens co-leader was responding to claims from former energy secretary Ewing that dependence on fossil fuels will be required for a “much longer period”.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said she will not support new oil or gas fields in Scottish waters, including the now paused Cambo development, and has instead focused on moving to renewable energies.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rejects plea to ramp up oil production to 'deal a blow' to Putin
The FM also insisted that ramping up the transition to renewables is the answer to the world moving away from reliance on Russian oil and gas.
However, Ewing disagrees, and previously claimed the transition period “will last for decades” and called for production to be ramped up instead.
His comments later came under fire from the Greens who said Ewing was "ignoring the climate crisis".
In an interview with ITV Border on Wednesday, Ewing was asked if the FM had made a mistake bringing Green ministers into government.
Ewing (pictured above) said the question should be directed to the FM, but added: “I can’t say that I’m a great enthusiast for the policies of the Green Party that do seem to me to be somewhat extreme.
“Particularly the policy of sacrificing the people in our oil and gas industry. I think they are amongst the best in the world.
“They do a great job. They keep the lights on, they keep the heating on in our homes. That’s valuable.
“We should be praising and thanking them, not saying that they should get their P45s tomorrow.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon fires back at 'patronising' Alister Jack in no-fly zone row
In response, Minister for Zero Carbon Buildings Harvie said that he didn’t think Ewing was speaking on behalf of the SNP when he made the comments.
Harvie said: “He’s aping and echoing the language of the Conservatives in calling Green politics extreme.
“It’s not a huge surprise to me that he would pick up on language from you know, fellow right-wingers, let's be honest.”
Harvie added that the world is facing the “critical challenge” of accelerating the transition away from reliance on fossil fuels.
Harvie (above) said: “Very clearly, our use of fossil fuels has brought the world to the brink of ecological crisis already and we know that it’s urgent we move away from it.
“We have to do that fairly, we have to have that just transition, that means investing in the jobs and industries of the future, not doubling down on the industries of the past - another round of dinosaur fuels.
“What we have is the opportunity to use this as a moment to recognise that addressing our ecological security, addressing the climate emergency, addressing our energy security and making sure that we're not subject to these volatile gas prices, and also addressing our geopolitical security by ensuring that countries like Russia, leaders like Vladimir Putin cannot use fossil fuels as an economic weapon.
NEW: SNP MSP Fergus Ewing is 'aping and echoing' Conservatives by calling @scottishgreens oil/gas policies 'extreme', @patrickharvie says.
— Representing Border (@ITVBorderRB) March 10, 2022
Scottish Greens co-leader says @FergusEwingSNP is 'picking up the language of fellow right wingers' and doesn't speak for the @theSNP pic.twitter.com/ljv0cMVF95
READ MORE: WATCH: Angus Robertson refuses to say if legal advice sought on referendum bill
“All of these are reason to go further and faster and with greater ambition to invest in a genuinely sustainable and renewable future.”
In response to Ewing’s interview, Scottish Tory shadow cabinet secretary for net zero Liam Kerr also used the word “extremist” to describe the Greens.
He said: “Fergus Ewing has thrown up in lights that the SNP Government is abandoning Scotland’s oil and gas industry because of the extremist Greens.
“Nicola Sturgeon must stop appeasing the Greens and back the North Sea oil and gas industry to secure our energy supply, protect jobs, and keep energy bills down.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel