NEWS of the planned demolition and redevelopment of Cumbernauld town centre has drawn much debate and attention. For some, the plans are welcome news – but for others, they represent a loss of valuable cultural heritage.
Historian of architecture Barnabas Calder is one of the latter voices. He believes, with the right attention and care, Cumbernauld’s town centre could be on-par with that of London’s “well maintained and widely loved” Barbican Estate.
He said: "Cumbernauld’s town centre has been consistently hacked around and neglected, but the right restoration would firstly save an enormous amount of embodied carbon relative to demolition and replacement, and secondly give back to Cumbernauld its position as a town of international interest and importance.
“Demolition will be bitterly regretted within the decade."
READ MORE: Cumbernauld town centre to be flattened and replaced
Cumbernauld is one of 27 new towns in the UK, with five of these being located in Scotland. New towns refer to towns built in the UK post Second World War. They were created to offer “a new way of living to hundreds of thousands of people”, through the provision of “good housing, new jobs and opportunities for leisure”.
New towns have long been a polarising issue visually and conceptually. While some admire the utopian ideals they were founded on and find beauty in their concrete structures, others critique the top-down approach to planning taken at the time, and find their Brutalist architecture lifeless.
Gair Dunlop, artist and senior lecturer at Duncan of Jordanstone, who grew up in Cumbernauld, believes that the issues facing new towns like Cumbernauld today should not be attributed to their architecture.
Instead, he tells us, the issues are more to do with “the collapse of light industry and the hoovering up of subsidy by multinationals”.
On growing up in Cumbernauld, he said: “The sense of the future in the place was really kind of paradoxical and strange. There was a sense of optimism there when I was growing up. The idea of the rough surfaces – it felt very science fiction."
Although he has fond memories of the town centre, he believes that the proposals are the right move.
“Some of the early photographs of it look elegant, but there’s a tiredness to it now," he explained. "Modernity needs an imagination to go with it. And the imagination of a society has changed. Cumbernauld is not beautiful, it’s not able to adapt to the 21st century.
“It does make me feel sad that it's going but I can understand why. I think it's probably too late for the town centre whether you love it or not."
However, others, like PhD student James Barrowman who grew up in Cumbernauld, would like to see the town centre saved.
READ MORE: In defence of Cumbernauld town centre: Why we'll miss it when it's gone
He said: “I’d like to see the development itself restored and held on to as a historical monument, but it's quite unlikely and very controversial.
“There’s a historical significance to it – it has one of the first shopping centres in the world and has very unique architecture. It is visionary high modernism that we should try to learn something from."
However, Barrowman continued, he can understand why some do not share his passion for the centre.
He said: “For my friends and family who still live in Cumbernauld, it's become a symbol for the stagnation and neglect that the town has gone through in general.
“People think if that goes, it will usher in a new era for the town. Personally, I think that’s a little bit misguided."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel