A MAJOR bank’s “ignorance” of Scots law has left a father furious while trying to reclaim more than £300,000 gambled by his schizophrenic son.
Iain McKechnie*, 53, has had continuing and welfare power of attorney over his son Lewis since he was sectioned due to his severe mental health problems last year.
He temporarily had the power to freeze his son’s accounts but Lewis has since overturned this – allowing the 29-year-old to spend thousands on online betting shops.
When Iain had approached Santander about closing the account, he says he had been met with responses peppered with English legal terms that do not apply in Scotland.
READ MORE: Scotland should bring in world-leading misogyny act, Baroness Helena Kennedy urges
Iain has been able to claim back just under half of the sum gambled by his son and is pursuing scores of online bookmakers to claw back the rest.
Continuing power of attorney granted Iain control over his son’s finances while he is “incapacitated” and allowed him to freeze Lewis’ bank accounts when he realised he was gambling huge sums.
When Iain has tried to freeze the accounts again, he claims Santander has told him he must obtain a Court of Protection order – which does not exist in Scotland.
Iain, from Edinburgh, said the ordeal has been “extremely taxing and exhausting”.
His psychiatrist has noted Lewis’ access to online gambling as “slowing down” his recovery from psychosis, Iain added.
“As a family it’s just been chaos,” he said.
“I’m supposed to be looking after his welfare and looking after him and has been interrupted with this ongoing hassle with Santander.
“They say they understand it’s causing extreme stress but it really doesn’t matter, that’s just words from them.”
Lewis served in the Royal Scots Borderers from 2015 to 2019, when he was medically discharged due to an eye condition.
Since then Lewis has struggled with his mental health, being diagnosed with psychosis and depression before he was sectioned at the Royal Edinburgh Hospital in March 2021 with schizophrenia.
Before that time he had never had a gambling addiction but afterwards he “went wild”.
Iain said: “He was delusional. He was attracted to sequences and he was able to collate numbers, colours and they were feeding back sequences to him.
“It just got out of hand. If you went into his hospital room, it was filled with random codes and pictures.
“[Lewis] sent Santander an email in March, clearly incapacitated, talking about higher elites and simulating money and stuff but it was ignored.”
Iain has taken the issue up with his MP Tommy Sheppard, who said it was time companies recognised “that there is more than one legal system on this island” and pledged to take the issue up with the bank.
Sheppard added: “It’s shocking that a business that presumably has thousands of customers on this side of the Border seems to have no idea of the differences between Scotland and England.
“In this case, that ignorance is directly hurting a vulnerable person.”
Top law firm Thorntons Solicitors said the English Court of Protection had “no jurisdiction” in Scotland.
READ MORE: Ronnie Cowan to speak at London gambling reform rally about its harms
Thorntons legal director Chris Gardiner said: “It is unfortunate to see that a major bank such as Santander does not have systems in place to deal with the differences in the systems in Scotland and England in relation to Powers of Attorney.
“We have always had a separate Office of the Public Guardian in Scotland and the Court of Protection is a component of the English system that does not have jurisdiction here.”
Santander insists they are aware of Scots law but would not confirm whether they have asked Iain to seek an English court order.
A spokesperson for the London-based bank said: “We appreciate this is a very difficult situation and have been in contact with Mr [McKechnie] as we continue to investigate the complex issues that he has raised.”
*Names have been changed
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel