A BILL being considered by Westminster threatens to “directly attack” the devolution settlement, the SNP have warned.
The Professional Qualifications Bill aims to revoke the current EU-based system for recognising professional qualifications gained overseas. The Tory government says the current system gives “preferential” treatment to qualifications gained outwith the UK.
However, the SNP say the bill has caused “great concern” within the Scottish and Welsh Parliaments due to its lack of legislative requirement for UK Ministers to obtain consent when legislating on devolved issues.
Three Plaid Cymru MPs, Ben Lake, Liz Saville Roberts, and Hywel Williams, with the support of SNP MP Owen Thompson, have tabled an amendment to the bill which would mean a UK minister “must obtain the consent” of a devolved assembly before legislating in devolved areas.
READ MORE: Devolution under 'systemic attack' from hostile UK Government, says Angus Robertson
The SNP said this clause would prevent the UK Government “ignoring the views of both the Scottish and Welsh Parliaments”.
The UK Government website states that neither the Senedd, Holyrood, or Stormont have so far consented to the Professional Qualifications Bill.
Thompson said: “The UK government’s Professional Qualification Bill has the potential to have a direct attack on the devolution settlement.
“The Scottish Government’s position on this has been clear from the outset: if there are satisfactory amendments made to the bill – such as the one being put forward by Plaid Cymru and supported by the SNP – then we will consent to the bill.
“However, just like with Brexit, we are being ignored by an arrogant, outdated Westminster system that believes it knows Scotland and Wales better than its own Governments.”
The MP for Midlothian said that Plaid Cymru’s amendment “works for all parties”, adding: “It would not undermine the UK Government’s ability to legislate on non-devolved matters, and would not prevent the Secretary of State from carrying out their functions on UK-wide issues.
“However, it would prevent Scottish and Welsh Ministers from being ignored over crucial devolved areas.
“This is a straight-forward, constructive amendment that will improve this bill greatly, and would protect the devolution settlement we have in place.
“If the UK Government fails to listen, then it is further proof that this Tory government is hell-bent on attacking the devolution settlement at every possible opportunity.”
READ MORE: Tory Internal Market Bill a 'threat to quality of teaching in Scottish schools'
The UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, which has sponsored the bill, said that introducing a clause which required devolved administrations' consent could mean the UK was unable to "promptly and consistently implement provisions on the recognition of professional qualifications in current and future international agreements".
A spokesperson said: “The Professional Qualifications Bill is essential to negotiating trade deals which will benefit Scotland. It will mean that UK regulators can recognise the professional qualifications of skilled professionals from around the world.
“We have engaged extensively with the devolved governments on the bill and will continue to work meaningfully, collaboratively and transparently with them to deliver for all parts of the United Kingdom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel