BREXIT has made tackling fraud “more difficult”, the director of legal services at the Crown Prosecution Service said.
Gregor McGill told the parliamentary justice committee on Tuesday that leaving the EU had created problems for police pursuing fraudsters overseas.
The committee heard that about 25% of fraud cases involved only defendants from the UK, with the number of cases involving “foreign” defendants rising “considerably more”.
It was also told that the number of computer-related fraud offences was “enormous”.
McGill said: “It’s still possible to do the work, but when you are outside the EU it’s hard because you have to go through treaties and you have to build up local relationships and local engagement to get done what was a matter of course when we were part of the EU.
"It doesn’t stop us doing it but it slows us down and makes it more difficult.”
Mark Fenhalls QC, chairman of the Bar Association, told the committee: “There’s an analogy with the lorries waiting to get their paperwork done, trying to cross the Channel.
“The fact is it hasn’t made us more agile, what is has meant is that we’ve had to rebuild and start relationships afresh with people who no longer trust us in the same way.”
The committee also heard that only around 0.75% of reported fraud was prosecuted, while Fenhalls said “fraud has not until now been a priority for anybody”.
McGill said: “I think we need to make fraud a priority for law enforcement agencies because it’s a sad fact that we talk about, ‘do people know what the state of fraud is?’.
“You’re more likely to be a victim of fraud than any other crime in this country and the cost to the economy is about £4.7 billion, so it is a significant issue so the priority is, really, I think really important.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel