REPRESENTATIVES from the hyper-Unionist Alliance for Unity have highlighted how one of the Scottish Conservatives’ newest policies was seemingly lifted directly from their Holyrood election campaign.
As the Scottish Tories kicked off their conference in Aberdeen on Friday, they also announced new policies to try and reverse the party’s ailing fortunes north of the Border.
One of these was the “Open the Books bill”, which party leader Douglas Ross said would “strengthen financial transparency and government accountability”.
“There is a pressing need to open the books,” he added.
READ MORE: Tories would suffer huge losses and fall behind Labour in new Holyrood vote, poll finds
However, that precise slogan was widely used by George Galloway’s Alliance for Unity (A4U) fringe party, which failed to return a single MSP.
I’m George Galloway. And I’m here to OPEN THE BOOKS @Alliance4Unity pic.twitter.com/VHbedKmzOR
— George Galloway (@georgegalloway) May 5, 2021
David Griffiths, a former A4U candidate who made headlines after sharing posts calling the First Minister a "fascist dictator", was one of the party’s representatives to point out the similarities.
He wrote: “Great idea. It was an equally good idea when @Alliance4Unity used ‘Open the books’ as our campaign slogan in the 2021 Holyrood election.
“If you need any more policy ideas, @Douglas4Moray, just get in touch with anyone from A4U.”
Great idea. It was an equally good idea when @Alliance4Unity used "Open the books" as our campaign slogan in the 2021 Holyrood election. If you need any more policy ideas, @Douglas4Moray, just get in touch with anyone from A4U. https://t.co/VvkSqpTIn1
— David Griffiths (@Erudite4Unity) March 18, 2022
Writing to Scottish Tory chief whip Stephen Kerr, he claimed the Scottish Conservatives had "stolen A4U's 2021 flagship election policy and presented it as a new idea".
"No need to thank me,” he added.
Griffiths is now involved with the Scottish Unionist Party (the SUP), which also publicly accused the Tories of stealing their policy.
It wrote on Twitter: “That will be the SUP policy of having a National Audit to open the books. Imitation is the highest form of flattery.”
Elsewhere, the Tories were accused of “rank hypocrisy” for calling for transparency of finances despite their own party’s involvement with “dark money” funds.
In one such case reported by The National, almost £100,000 was donated to the party through the shadowy Scottish Unionist Association Trust in a single year.
SNP MSP Audrey Nicoll said: “The rank hypocrisy of the Tories preaching about open finances is simply staggering.
“Their government has presided over the rampant cronyism of handing out Covid contracts to their friends, family and party donors, the murky issue of Boris Johnson’s Downing Street refurbishment, the endless flow of dirty Russian cash into their party coffers and stuffing the House of Lords with the likes of [Evgeny] Lebedev.
READ MORE: UK minister rages after being confronted over Tory links to Russian oligarchs
“The Tories ‘one rule for them and another for everyone else’ does not wash with the people of Scotland, who refuse to overlook dodgy Tory finances or forgive their partying Prime Minister - even if Douglas Ross is happy to.”
The final reference was to Ross’s decision to U-turn on calls for Boris Johnson to step down, insisting that the Prime Minister he said could not lead the UK in January is now the best man to lead during wartime.
The Tories’ “Open the Books bill” would require the Scottish Government to publish a quarterly update of the Budget, require the Scottish Government to publish monthly data on the uptake and payouts from each fund it operates, and require the Scottish Government to publish a value-for-money statement ahead of taking ownership of any private enterprise.
A4U fell apart earlier this month over disagreements around the Ukraine invasion.
The Scottish Tories have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel