THE UK has “missed out on much of the recovery in global trade” following the pandemic likely as a result of Brexit, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has said.
The analysis from the statutory body, which is tasked with providing government with independent data, came in its “Economic and fiscal outlook” report published on Wednesday.
As well as looking at key areas such as inflation, GDP, and borrowing, the report looked into the latest evidence on the impact of Brexit on UK trade.
The OBR stated that UK good exports to the EU were down by 18 per cent on 2019 levels (Brexit happened on January 31, 2020).
READ MORE: Boris Johnson faces snub from key leaders' summit after Brexit-Ukraine comments
It adds that there is “little sign to date” of UK goods exports to non-EU countries making up for lower exports to the EU.
The OBR report goes on: “Comparing our recent overall trade performance with other advanced economies suggests that the UK saw a similar collapse in exports as other countries at the start of the pandemic but has since missed out on much of the recovery in global trade.”
Cited as evidence for this statement is a report from John Springford, the deputy director of the Centre for European Reform in London. Entitled “The Cost of Brexit: December 2021”, the report found a weak overall UK goods export performance compared to if the UK had stayed in the EU.
The OBR report continues: “UK and aggregate advanced economy goods export volumes fell by around 20 per cent during the initial wave of the pandemic in 2020. But by the fourth quarter of 2021 total advanced economy trade volumes had rebounded to 3 per cent above their pre-pandemic levels while UK exports remain around 12 per cent below.
“The UK therefore appears to have become a less trade intensive economy, with trade as a share of GDP falling 12 per cent since 2019, two and a half times more than in any other G7 country.”
The report says that “Brexit-related effects” are likely to include the fact that the UK is a relatively small market for individual EU exporters, “so it may not be worth” the cost of continuing to export to the UK.
The OBR cites a survey of German firms which found that 17 per cent of them had ceased importing goods to the UK post-Brexit “at least temporarily”.
Elsewhere, it found that imports from the EU had fallen by a larger percentage than exports to the EU. It states: “In the fourth quarter of 2021, goods imports from the EU were down 18 per cent on 2019 levels, double the 9 per cent fall in goods exports to the EU.”
READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: UK is playing its role on world stage ... as useful idiot
It goes on: “While additional trade with other countries could offset some of the decline in trade with the EU, none of the agreements concluded to date are of a sufficient scale to have a material impact on our forecast.
“The Government’s own estimate of the economic impact of the free-trade agreement with Australia, the first to be concluded with a country that does not have a similar arrangement with the EU, is that it would raise total UK exports by 0.4 per cent, imports by 0.4 per cent and the level of GDP by only 0.1 per cent over 15 years.”
In reference to the New Zealand trade deal, the OBR said any economic impacts are likely to be “negligible” in the next five years, adding that the Government’s own data estimated a rise “of real GDP in 2035 by between 0.023 and 0.034 per cent” as a result of the agreement.
How has Brexit affected your Scottish business?
Has Brexit had an impact on your Scottish business? Whether you work in hospitality, travel, or any other sector we would love to hear from you. We already know leaving the EU has meant empty shop shelves, delays in orders and price rises for Scots businesses. Now we want to hear from owners themselves to find out what Brexit has done to our firms.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel