ALEX Salmond has said the SNP’s plans for a second independence referendum do not look “credible” ahead of the Alba Party conference.
The former First Minister has hit out at Nicola Sturgeon’s timetable saying her intentions of holding indyref2 by the end of 2023 “look pretty optimistic, to say the least”.
Speaking ahead of his party’s conference at Hampden Park in Glasgow on Saturday, Salmond revealed Alba is publishing a new 38-page booklet to update the arguments for independence eight years on from the first vote.
READ MORE: Màiri McAllan says Stephen Kerr MSP tried to 'patronise and belittle' her
In an interview with The Herald, Salmond said there was a “a huge amount of impatience among independence supporters” over the SNP’s plans for a second vote.
He added: “It seems unlikely that Boris Johnson is going to meekly say to the Scottish Government: ‘Well done, chaps, you can now have a referendum and I am changing my mind on the issue.’ Therefore, you have to campaign to change his mind and have a series of contingencies as to what you do if Westminster says no.”
He said the independence movement must focus on efforts to “bend Westminster to the will of the Scottish people” and said Alba will be calling for a convention after the local elections in May involving pro-independence politicians and civic Scotland.
READ MORE: Forget independence, the local election campaign must focus on local issues - Joanna Cherry
Scotland should focus on establishing a new currency post-independence “much earlier” than was envisaged in 2014, he said, and noted Brexit had changed the conversation around an independent Scotland’s membership of the EU.
“Alba is putting forward a prospectus that Scotland should immediately apply for EFTA membership, which is a matter of months in terms of being achievable,” he said.
“It’s a much more credible position.”
The Wee Alba Book will also address questions around the debt burden an independent Scotland could expect, currency and borders.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel