CRAIG Murray, who was jailed after a court ruled he made blog posts that could have identified Alex Salmond’s accusers, has lost a legal challenge against his prison sentence.
Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, had become a blogger and pro-independence campaigner and wrote a series of articles on the former first minister’s high court trial in 2020.
The 63-year-old was jailed for eight months for contempt of court after prosecutors said his articles contained details which, if pieced together, could lead readers to identify the women who made allegations against Salmond, who was acquitted of all 13 charges including sexual assault and attempted rape in March last year.
READ MORE: Tories drop Jamie Robertson after KKK video interest exposé
Murray wanted the finding of contempt and the jail sentence quashed.
But in a written judgement on Friday, five judges at the Court of Appeal in Edinburgh rejected his challenge.
Scotland’s senior judge, the Lord Justice General Lord Carloway, said: “The petitioner (Murray) is an intelligent person whose actions were deliberate and calculated.
“They clearly showed contempt for the court’s order and for the rule of law.
“They created serious risks for the complainers’ mental and physical health.”
The judge said Murray showed “a substantial degree of arrogance” and said the contempt committed was of “very great gravity”.
He said: “The petitioner deliberately set out to publish information likely to lead to the identification of the complainers and did so.
“The revelation of the identities of the complainers would be likely to result in considerable abuse and harassment (particularly on social media) against them. There was a real danger that they would be physically harmed.”
Lord Calloway added Murray showed “a total lack of remorse” about his actions, “and perhaps insight into the consequences of his actions”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel