POLICE witnesses in the Sheku Bayoh inquiry cannot be guaranteed that their evidence will not be used against them in any future prosecution, they have been warned.
A public inquiry will open in May into the death of the 31-year-old in May 2015 after he was restrained by police who were responding to a call in Kirkcaldy, Fife.
The inquiry asked the Crown to give undertakings to 12 named officers that it will not use any evidence they provide against them in any prosecution which might arise over the events surrounding Bayoh’s death, and the post-incident management.
However, Solicitor General Ruth Charteris QC said she is not satisfied that it is in the public interest to grant that request.
She said: “I respect the request from the inquiry and the views of the core participants in relation to this.
“Prosecutors must consider all cases on their individual facts and circumstances and act in the public interest.
“I have considered all the information available to me, and I am not currently satisfied that it is in the public interest to grant the undertakings.
“It is not known if officers will invoke their right to claim privilege against self-incrimination.
“Nor is it known what impact any such claim would have on the totality of the evidence available to the inquiry.
“I will give individual consideration to any future request for an undertaking should it become clear that the inquiry will be prevented from fulfilling its terms of reference.”
READ MORE: Man dies in police custody in Kirkcaldy, where Sheku Bayoh died
Lawyers for the Scottish Police Federation and officers involved in the case previously said they wanted an undertaking that no evidence given to the inquiry by any officer would be used against them in any criminal proceedings, or when deciding if they should face prosecution.
A preliminary hearing for the inquiry earlier this year heard that without such an undertaking some officers could refuse to answer questions about Mr Bayoh’s death.
Lord Bracadale had also sought an undertaking from Fiona Taylor, Deputy Chief Constable of Police Scotland, that she would not seek to rely on evidence given to the inquiry by an officer in any future disciplinary proceedings against that officer arising from the events of May 3.
She declined to give such an undertaking.
Lord Bracadale said: “I acknowledge the decisions of the Solicitor General and Deputy Chief Constable, published today, in respect of the request for undertakings.
“It is a matter entirely for the Solicitor General and Deputy Chief Constable whether or not to give the undertakings sought. I note that the Solicitor General has left open the possibility of revisiting the issue of whether to give undertakings on an individual basis to officers involved.
“Consequently, I will now seek statements from each of the officers to ascertain how much information they are willing to provide to the inquiry without undertakings from the Solicitor General. Once those statements have been obtained by my team, I will assess how best to proceed.
“The inquiry is fully committed to ascertaining the truth of how Sheku Bayoh died on 3 May 2015 and will keep all options open with a view to retrieving the fullest possible evidence in relation to events that day.
“The inquiry has already obtained statements previously provided by the officers as part of more than 30,000 pieces of evidence currently being considered.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here