DOUGLAS Ross is a “lame duck leader on borrowed time” after suggesting Boris Johnson should stay in post even if he is found to have broken the law over lockdown breaches, the SNP has said.
The Scottish Tory leader was the first senior figure in his party to call for the Prime Minister to go in the wake of the Downing Street scandal.
He had previously stated Johnson’s position was “longer tenable” and submitted a letter asking for a vote of no confidence to the backbench 1922 committee.
The Met Police has now handed out 20 fines to people who attended lockdown-breaking parties in Downing Street and Whitehall.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross takes back Boris Johnson resignation call in embarrassing U-turn
Downing Street has said Johnson has not received a fine at this time - but also not ruled out that this could happen, saying it would be made known if the Prime Minister did receive a penalty.
Speaking after the fines were issued, a spokesman for Ross said “the current global crisis is bigger than any disagreements we have had” and that destabilising the UK government would “only help Vladimir Putin achieve his appalling ambitions”.
SNP Depute Westminster Leader Kirsten Oswald MP said Ross has “shattered the last of any credibility he may have had”.
She said: “Having marched his Holyrood group up to the top of the hill demanding Boris Johnson’s resignation, he has left himself and his MSPs looking utterly ridiculous.
“He is a lame duck leader, and is now on borrowed time as head of the Tory branch office in Scotland.
“Just a month or so ago he was adamantly calling for Boris Johnson to be removed from Downing Street over his repeated rule-breaking – yet now he thinks he should carry on in post even if that rule-breaking is confirmed with a police fine.
“It’s as if he thinks we’ll all just forget that he submitted a letter of no-confidence in the Prime Minister just weeks ago.
“We already have confirmation by the Metropolitan Police that the law was, indeed, broken by Downing Street and initial fines have already been issued but Douglas Ross has seemingly decided that he no longer cares that the Prime Minister took the whole of the UK for fools.”
Last year Ross repeatedly called for Nicola Sturgeon to resign as First Minister after a majority of MSPs on the Alex Salmond committee found she misled their inquiry. An independent inquiry later found she did not breach the ministerial code.
Oswald added: “His weasel words that this isn’t the time to pursue such issues is sheer hypocrisy given that just a year ago he and his party tabled a no-confidence motion in the First Minister at the height of the pandemic.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross won't back Boris Johnson to lead Tories into next General Election
Ross announced earlier this month he had withdrawn both his call for Johnson’s resignation and his letter of no confidence because of the Ukraine war, saying he didn’t care if it made him look like a “lightweight”.
After the fines were issued by the Met Police, a spokesman for Ross told The Times that people who have broken the law in the parties “have received the appropriate punishment for their actions”.
He added: “We made our feelings clear at the time and we fully understand the public’s anger.
“However, the current global crisis is bigger than any disagreements we have had.
“In the middle of war in Europe and the crisis in Ukraine, destabilising the UK government would only help Vladimir Putin achieve his appalling ambitions.
“The people of Ukraine have relied on the UK government to be one of their strongest allies in this war, as President Zelensky made clear when he addressed the UK parliament and reiterated in recent days.
“The UK government has the full support of the Scottish Conservatives in opposing the crimes that Russia have committed and helping the people of Ukraine.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel