BORIS Johnson has insisted he got the “overall picture” correct when quizzed on “misleading” figures he has repeatedly given to Parliament.
The UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) took the unusual step of sending a public letter to the Prime Minister in February after he repeatedly claimed that employment was higher than it had been before the pandemic.
UKSA chair Sir David Norgrove told Johnson it was “wrong” to make such a claim, saying the data showed the number of people in employment to be down by around 600,000 – despite a rise in the number of people on payrolls.
Norgrove said Johnson would be giving a “misleading impression” if he claimed more people were in employment and failed to make this distinction clear.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson refuses to say he'd step down if he broke ministerial code
Quizzed about the UKSA intervention during his appearance in front of Westminster’s Liaison Committee, Johnson insisted he had gotten the “overall picture” correct.
"The employment record of the government has been absolutely outstanding," he added.
Labour MP Stephen Timms asked the Prime Minister if he accepted the “point in the letter”.
“I just wanted to confirm that you recognise that total employment is now less than it was before the pandemic began,” Timms (below) said.
“Well unemployment is actually,” Johnson began, before being reminded the question was about employment.
Johnson said he had been “mindful of Sir David’s chastisement” but insisted that “on all occasions I stressed that it was payroll employment that I was talking about”.
In fact, Johnson told Parliament on January 19: “We have more people in employment and more employees on the payroll now than there were before the pandemic began.”
He said on January 12 that the UK had “420,000 more people in work now than before the pandemic began”, repeating a near-verbatim claim made on January 5.
Timms brought Johnson’s history of repeating the misleading claim up, saying: “On the employment point, you have said in the Commons, nine times I think, that the number of people in work is higher now than it was before the start of the pandemic.”
The Tory leader responded that he believed he had taken “steps to correct the record”.
When this was questioned, Johnson seemed unsure if he had in fact corrected the record, looking to those behind him to confirm.
He then added: “I certainly was very, I've been very punctilious to talk about payroll and employment.”
Ed Humpherson, the director-general of the UKSA, told The Observer that there had been several “informal discussions” behind the scenes about the Prime Minister’s incorrect use of the data before any public interventions were made.
In a letter sent in early February, before Norgrove’s later that same month, Humpherson told No 10 it was "disappointing" that Johnson had "continued to refer to payroll employment as if describing total employment, despite contact from our office and from others".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel