Pornography websites should introduce age verification tools as quickly as possible to better protect children from harmful content, an open letter from child safety groups has urged.
Published by children’s charity Barnardo’s, the letter calls on commercial porn sites to change their content standards to bring them into line with the British Board of Film Classification’s ratings for violent and pornographic content.
The letter, which has been signed by more than a dozen safety organisations, argues that many porn sites feature depictions of practices that meet the definition of criminal standards for sexual violence and would be illegal to buy on DVD or Blu-ray in the UK, and the same standards should apply online.
It comes in the wake of the Online Safety Bill entering Parliament, which will introduce laws to force sites hosting pornographic content to implement age verification processes, but Barnardo’s has warned this could take up to three years to be implemented, which is why it and other groups are calling on sites to voluntarily introduce age verification as soon as possible.
A YouGov survey commissioned by Barnardo’s and published alongside the open letter showed that 69% of UK adults agree that the kind of extreme pornography that would be illegal on DVD should also be illegal online.
Barnardo’s chief executive, Lynn Perry, said: “Every day children are seeing harmful pornography online and we must act now to protect them.
“The Government has rightly committed to passing new laws but they could take up to three years to come into force, and in the meantime millions of children could be seeing harmful content millions of times over, with serious consequences for their mental health, their understanding of consent, and their perception of healthy relationships.
“That’s why as a group of organisations supporting children and young people, we are calling on the owners of leading commercial pornography sites to take action by introducing age-verification measures now, before it becomes a legal requirement.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here