MOTHERS and babies seeking asylum in Scotland are still being housed in cramped and unsafe conditions that pose a significant risk of violating their human rights, according to a new report.
The office of the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland has found that despite assurances from provider the Mears Group in November 2021, many women and their children have not been moved to more suitable housing.
They are currently placed in bedsit accommodation in Glasgow’s Southside, by the Mears Group with no substantial opposition noted from Glasgow City Council and the Glasgow Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP).
Mothers have told the commissioner and his staff that there is no space to feed their babies, limited washing and cooking facilities, and little support. Cookers and heaters in the rooms are close to babies’ cots and it’s not safe to let them play, crawl, or stand.
These conditions pose a significant risk of violating the children’s human rights including the right to survival, safety and development, an adequate standard of living, the best possible health, family life, and the right to play.
A mum who lives in the unit with her child said: “The worst part is knowing my child isn’t safe. I’m in a new country, a new mum, and I don’t have support. I worry about my child far more than I worry about myself”.
In April 2021, charities and grassroots organisations raised human rights concerns about the unit, formerly used to house single men. In June, the commissioner’s team visited the accommodation and met mums and their children.
Following discussions with the Mears Group, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA), and the HSCP, the commissioner called for the mothers and babies to be rehoused. They also called for Glasgow City Council, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, and the HSCP to withdraw their support for the Home Office and Mears Group’s placements in the unit.
The report recommends that:
- All mothers and babies in the unit are urgently relocated.
- COSLA and partners must amend procedures to ensure human rights duties of statutory agencies.
- The Scottish Government should legislate to create human rights-based statutory minimum housing standards for children.
- Glasgow City Council, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, and the HSCP must commit to not approving any asylum accommodation for children that violates their human rights.
Nick Hobbs, Head of Advice and Investigations at the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, said he was “shocked” upon seeing the conditions, calling the accommodation “totally unsuitable” for mothers and babies, especially given their vulnerable status as seeking asylum.
He said: “Asylum accommodation is a reserved matter to Westminster, but use of this unit has been approved by Glasgow City Council and the health board.
“Scottish public bodies have human rights obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and must ensure that all their decisions are consistent with the UNCRC. They could have withheld or withdrawn support and advocated for more suitable accommodation.
“We must make sure all refugee and asylum-seeking children are treated with dignity and respect for their human rights. No child should live in conditions that violate their human rights and the Scottish Government should legislate urgently to create human rights-based statutory minimum housing standards for children”.
Yvonne Blake, co-founder of Migrants Organising for Rights and Empowerment (MORE), said: “All mothers and babies should live in conditions that are conducive to the nurturing of their babies and the mothers’ health and well-being.
“The unit is wholly unsuitable to have mothers and babies living there, especially during the first year of their lives which is crucial for development. They need to be housed where the mums have support and the children can play.
“The authorities, including Glasgow City Council, must act on the recommendations in this report and act on the numerous calls by the mothers and supporting groups to rehouse the mothers and babies into suitable accommodation in the community where they have support."
Graham O’Neill, Policy Manager at Scottish Refugee Council, said: “We echo the commissioner’s call for the women and children to be moved urgently to proper accommodation that is safe and fit for their needs as new mothers, babies and toddlers.
“Too often, people’s needs are forgotten or neglected within the asylum system. Unfortunately, we are seeing inappropriate and substandard housing being used more often, including long-term stays in what should be very temporary accommodation and an increase in institutional settings such as hotel rooms and army barracks.
“This is completely inappropriate for people who have fled violent conflicts and are living with the ongoing effects of trauma”.
In response to today’s findings, a spokesperson from Mears stated that service users remaining in the facility will be moved to suitable alternative accommodation by the end of the month, prior to a “review of the future use of the facility”.
They said they acknowledged concerns raised by the report, but that “these findings do not reflect our intentions around the use of the facility”. They added the feedback they had received from the local authority and the Glasgow Health and Social Care Partnership had been “generally positive”.
A council spokesperson on behalf of Glasgow City Council and the HSCP said: “It is not the case that the council or Health and Social Care Partnership have given this unit full approval. We do not have a role as the contractual arrangement exists between Mears and the Home Office.
“Whilst Covid has caused delays in moving mothers to date, we understand the remaining mothers in the unit will be moved into alternative accommodation by the end of April”.
However, according to COSLA, it is not uncommon for consultees to raise objections to proposed procurement, and these have always been respected. No procurement has gone ahead contrary to the advice of statutory bodies since the protocol had been in force, said a representative from the Children and Young People's Commissioner.
Furthermore, when pressed on the “generally positive” feedback Mears referred to, the council spokesperson confirmed they provided feedback “in terms of evidence and opinion” that “there have been women and children accommodated who have thrived and benefited from being accommodated in the unit”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here