NEWLY announced Ofcom chairman Lord Michael Grade has admitted he does not use social media but claims he does “understand the dynamics”.
The 79-year-old Conservative peer, who has held senior positions at all three of the UK’s major media outlets, appeared before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee on Thursday for pre-appointment scrutiny, after being named the Government’s preferred candidate for the post.
Such hearings are held to allow select committees to scrutinise the quality of ministerial appointments and assess the candidate’s suitability for the role, knowledge and experience.
The media executive was grilled on issues including the selection process for his role, online safety and the regulation of tech giants.
However, he admitted he does not use Facebook, Instagram or TikTok, although he has WhatsApp to communicate with his family.
John Nicolson, from the SNP, challenged him over an apparent “lack of engagements with such an important part of contemporary life” and suggested this would “prove problematic” because his new role required such an understanding.
Lord Grade responded: “I wouldn’t say I have no experience at all. I have three kids. I have a 23-year-old student son who is never off his screen.”
He then added to the committee: “I do understand the dynamics.”
“The important thing as chairman of Ofcom, we can’t be experts of every aspect of the turf that Ofcom has to patrol.
“What we have to do is ensure that we have access to the best brains that we can hire and the best advisers and the best expertise that we can to make sure we have a match for what’s going on in those sectors.”
READ MORE: Lord Michael Grade 'is favourite' for Ofcom chair job
Lord Grade said that at the end of his three years in the role he hoped “people can see that we are giving good effect to what Parliament has laid down for us to do and the tech companies are taking us very seriously and beginning to understand – it won’t happen overnight – that lip service to responsibility is no longer acceptable”.
While discussing cancel culture and the debate over so-called woke TV and radio programming, Lord Grade said he “admired” Laurence Fox, the actor turned political campaigner.
He said: “I admire his courage. I have known his family. His grandfather and my father were partners in business going back a long way.
“I admire his courage in speaking out and contributing to the debate. I don’t necessarily agree with what he says, but I admire him speaking out.”
Lord Grade has previously spoken in favour of the privatisation of Channel 4 and recently criticised the BBC’s coverage of events such as the Downing Street parties as “gleeful and disrespectful”.
Defending his comments, he told the committee: “I described the licence fee as regressive. I didn’t think that was an opinion, I thought that was a statement of fact, actually.”
Referring to Channel 4 and whether it should be privatised, he added: “As far as Channel 4 is concerned, that is my opinion. I fought privatisation twice as chief executive of Channel 4 – once with Mrs Thatcher and once with John Major.
“I would say that the world has changed. There were only four channels in those days and BSB and Sky were broke, so it was a very different world.”
During his career, Lord Grade has served as controller of BBC One, chief executive of Channel 4, chairman of the BBC and executive chairman of ITV.
He currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords after being appointed by David Cameron in 2011.
If confirmed as Ofcom chairman he will move to the cross-benches and give up any non-executive roles that could cause a conflict of interest.
He was named for the position after a lengthy recruitment process which was branded as “chaotic and frankly embarrassing” by Labour.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel