THE new Scottish Child Payment is “already making a difference” to children living in poverty, the director of a leading children's charity has said.
The Child Poverty Action Group comments come in the wake of the release of the latest official child poverty data at the UK and Scotland levels.
Statistics released by the DWP this week, though less reliable than usual due to difficulties with data collection over the course of the pandemic, nevertheless align with independent forecasts and indicate that an estimated 400,000 children across the UK were pulled out of relative poverty in 2020/21, when Universal Credit was increased by £20 per week.
However, the UK Government’s cut to this uplift in October 2021 is believed to have pushed those children back into poverty.
READ MORE: Scottish Child Payment to increase to £25 per week by end of 2022
Coupled with Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s refusal to increase benefits in line with inflation from April, child poverty campaigners have argued that children remain more likely to be in poverty than working-age adults or pensioners.
According to CPAG, the new figures – which show that, at 3.9 million, the number of children in poverty across the UK was still 300,000 higher than in 2010-11 – demonstrate that investment in social security is the most efficient way of reducing child poverty and supporting struggling households.
Despite there being insufficient data for official Scottish poverty statistics to be published for 2018-21, the Scottish Government has released an analytical report on the existing data around "persistent poverty" for transparency. This suggests that one in ten children in Scotland lived in poverty for three of the four years leading up to 2020.
Commenting, CPAG in Scotland director John Dickie said: “The latest data on child poverty at Scotland and UK level is another stark reminder of the urgent need to support family incomes.
“The temporary £20 increase to Universal Credit shows that government has the power to protect children from poverty. But many of the children who were lifted out of poverty by that increase have already been forced back over the brink by the UK Government’s decision to end the uplift.
"And, in a week when the Chancellor said he was comfortable with his choices, it looks like UK ministers have turned their backs on low-income families."
“Here in Scotland,” Dickie added, “the better news is that we know that the new Scottish Child Payment is already making a difference. Once fully rolled out and increased to £25 it will substantially cut the number of children living in poverty.
“It’s now vital that take-up of the new payment is maximised, it is rolled out as soon as possible and the wider actions to improve income from paid work set out in the Scottish Government’s new child poverty delivery plan are implemented effectively.”
As part of the Child Poverty (Scotland) Act, the Scottish Government is committed to reducing relative child poverty to less than 18% by 2023-24, and to less than 10% by the end of the decade.
In addition to the Scottish Child Payment increase, the Scottish Government will also provide an extra £53 million to employment services, increase access to childcare, and has created a new £15 million transitions fund to support parents going into work.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here