CABINET member Jacob Rees-Mogg has suggested “every last drop” of oil should be extracted from the North Sea.
The Brexit Opportunities Minister made the comments as Number 10 confirmed its energy security strategy will be published on Thursday.
The energy strategy was promised in response to demands to divest from Russian fuel over its invasion of Ukraine and to address a growing cost-of-living crisis.
READ MORE: Cambo oilfield: UK Government slated for keeping 'doomed oilfield on life support'
In an interview with LBC, Rees-Mogg stressed the need for oil firms to be able to keep their profits amid calls for a windfall tax to ease spiralling bills “so they get every last drop out of the North Sea”.
During the interview, the Brexit Opportunities Minister also compared the fracking threat to “a rock fall in a disused coal mine”.
Rees-Mogg described fracking as “quite an interesting opportunity” amid suggestions the moratorium could be lifted in response to the Ukraine crisis.
In Scotland, there is already a formal moratorium banning fracking – ministers have suggested that the Scottish Government’s regulatory powers are not sufficient to outlaw it altogether.
However, former Scottish environment minister Paul Wheelhouse promised in 2019 that the Government would look at bringing forward new legislation in the future if needed.
The Welsh government has also banned fracking.
READ MORE: Keep fracking paused, SNP urge Tories amid 'knee-jerk' calls
During his media appearance, Rees-Mogg said he was “very impressed” by a Royal Society report that he says “pointed out that the seismic effect from fracking was equivalent to, if not slightly less than, a rock fall in a disused coal mine”.
“So I think one needs proportionality about the seismic issues,” he added.
Downing Street said the fracking moratorium, introduced in England in 2019 after the process triggered earthquakes, “still remains” but cited the invasion of Ukraine requiring a need to “look at all possible options for improving domestic energy supply”.
“This can only proceed if the science says it is safe, sustainable and causes only minimal disturbance to local communities,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.
On further North Sea oil extraction, he added: “Certainly it’s right that domestic-produced oil and gas will play an important part of the transition to net zero.”
A spokesperson for the SNP said Rees-Mogg is "arguably the last person on the planet we should be listening to" regarding the earth's future.
"The climate emergency hasn't gone away," they went on. "That is why the Scottish Government remains absolutely committed to ending Scotland's contribution to climate change by 2045 in a just and fair way.
"However, for as long as Scotland remains part of a dysfunctional, outdated Westminster system - which offers people like Jacob Rees-Mogg prominent and powerful positions - our net-zero targets will always be at risk.
"That is why Scotland needs the full powers of independence in order to build a stronger, fairer, and greener society."
Teesside Wind Farm near the mouth of the River Tees off the North Yorkshire coast
Alba's depute leader Kenny MacAskill said while he believes oil and gas supplies cannot simply be turned off, he thinks Rees-Mogg's claims demonstrate the need for Scotland to control its own energy.
"Scotland has had enough of Tory ministers like Rees-Mogg treating Scotland as a cash cow for the UK Treasury and an energy reserve to be exploited," he told The National.
"Rees-Mogg should be told to get his hands off Scotland’s oil.
“It is time for Scotland to take control of her own energy into her own hands through independence. Then we can decide the rate of extraction compatible with net zero and reap the benefits of our huge energy resources which we have been denied for so long.”
A spokesperson for the Scottish Government made it clear that unlimited fossil fuel extraction is not compatible with the country's climate efforts.
“Recent actions by Russia only serve to highlight the importance of accelerating the transition to renewable energy sources," they told The National. "In Scotland, the equivalent of nearly 100% of our electricity demand already comes from renewable sources and we are focused on reducing reliance on fossil fuels while accelerating the deployment of renewable energy still further.”
Over the weekend, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said he does not “favour a vast increase in onshore wind farms”.
READ MORE: Ukraine accuses Russia of massacre as bodies found near Kyiv
He told Sky they “can create something of an eyesore for communities as well as actual problems of noise as well” as he favoured the development of turbines offshore.
Johnson’s spokesman said onshore turbines should be built when “locally supported”, adding: “You’ll see more about our position on energy in our strategy published on Thursday.”
The Prime Minister has appeared to shift support to offshore wind as their possible expansion concerned some colleagues over their impact on communities.
He also indicated the need for new nuclear development, including smaller modular reactors.
But his long-awaited energy security strategy was repeatedly put back last month amid suggestions Chancellor Rishi Sunak was resisting new spending commitments.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel