THE University of Stirling has hit back at “erroneous” reports from right-wing media that it has replaced Jane Austen on one of its courses in order to aid the “decolonisation of the curriculum”.
Following a report from the Telegraph that the author of Sense And Sensibility and Pride And Prejudice had been “dropped” on one of Stirling’s literature courses in favour of the Nobel Prize-winning American author Toni Morrison, numerous other media outlets subsequently attributed Austen’s alleged replacement to efforts by the university to “contribute to increased diversity”, with GB News describing Austen as having been “cancelled".
However, many on social media quickly responded by highlighting the fact that the course in question – a "special Authors" module – changes its focus every year, and that the course description contains no reference to decolonisation.
The course description notes: “[Toni Morrison] emerged as one of the greatest and most prolific writers of the twentieth century, and her audiences have continued to be captivated by her literary genius in this millennial age.
"She is one of the most revered writers within the American literary establishment and has helped to shape it both as a critic and novelist. Her work can help one to develop more mastery in reading as a genre.”
Speaking to the National, a spokesperson for the University of Stirling said: “Contrary to erroneous media reports, the University has not withdrawn or replaced – nor do we have plans to withdraw or replace – the teaching of Jane Austen from our curriculum. The English programme covers a wide variety of canonical authors and literary periods – and Austen remains part of our teaching.
“By definition, our ‘Special Authors’ module does not permanently focus on one particular author – it changes on a regular basis and Toni Morrison is the novelist currently featured."
The spokesperson added: “As you would expect from a forward-looking university, we routinely refresh our curriculum and are proud that our programmes are broad and inclusive, and enable divergent voices to be featured in our teaching."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel