LABOUR MP Emily Thornberry has been praised for her response to the question of whether or not a “woman can have a penis”.
The shadow attorney general made an appearance on Nick Ferrari’s LBC show on Friday morning and was asked to give a “detailed” answer to the question about transgender people.
It comes after Labour leader Keir Starmer floundered when asked the same question on the show last week.
READ MORE: Scottish Government not consulted on Boris Johnson's energy plan
Ferrari continually pushed Starmer to answer the question, but he refused to bite.
On Friday, the same issue was put to Thornberry.
Presenter Ferarri said: “You [Thornberry] were once asked - can a woman have a penis and said people are complex and different, it's up to listeners to decide if I've given a full answer to that.
“Are you ready to give us a slightly more detailed rather than nuanced answer to that question, can a woman have a penis?”
The Labour MP was quick to retort: “Most women are like me or the women MPs you know, or my mum, or my daughter.
'Women who are trans deserve to be recognised and yes some of them will have penises. Frankly, I'm not looking up their skirts, I don't care.'@NickFerrariLBC presses Emily Thornberry on whether a woman can have a penis. pic.twitter.com/72RH40T3KB
— LBC (@LBC) April 8, 2022
“Of course most women are biologically adult females.
“There are however, a minority of people who are born into the wrong gender who are deeply unhappy and marginalized people who frankly, we should have a bit of compassion for and should not be using them in some sort of culture war.
“Women who are trans deserve to be recognised and yes, therefore some of them will have penises.
“Frankly, I'm not looking at that skirt. I don't care.
READ MORE: Plan to limit how much of Scotland can be bought by landowners in new Land Justice Bill
“What I care about is that they're looked after properly and that they are not used as a political football by a Prime Minister who ought to know better.”
Social media users backed the MP's answer.
One said: "This is the ONLY answer."
Another added: "Win for Thornberry to a frankly tedious line of questioning."
While one added: "Great answer by Thornberry to a question which no reputable journalist should even be asking. This might all be one big joke to Nick who has no idea what being marginalised feels like but these are human beings we are talking about, we should have at least an ounce of empathy."
It comes after Starmer gave a slightly different answer to the same question. After being pushed, he told LBC: "I'm not... I don't think we can conduct this debate with...
"I don't think that discussing this issue in this way helps anyone in the long run.
"What I want to see is a reform of the law as it is, but I am also an advocate of safe spaces for women and I want to have a discussion that is... anybody who genuinely wants to find a way through this, I want to discuss that with, and I do find that too many people - in my view - retreat or hold a position of which is intolerant of others.
"And that's not picking on any individual at all, but I don't like intolerance, I like open discussion."
The line of questioning has been leveled at other UK politicians including Jacob-Rees Mogg, who said no, and then quoted the Bible.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel