TORY MP Greg Hands was humiliated on BBC Question Time last night as he failed to demonstrate an accurate understanding of the term “loan”.
Hands, the UK Minister of State for Business, Energy and Clean Growth stated that in February, the Chancellor Exchequer launched a “really important package” which included a £200 discount on energy bills.
However, presenter Fiona Bruce corrected him, stating that the £200 is “of course” a loan.
Hands replied: “It’s not a loan. It’s a discount”, to which Bruce pointed out “But you have to pay it back? You’re not being given it, you have to pay it back. It sounds like a loan.”
This lead to an eruption of laughter from the audience, while Hands flustered.
“You’re all shouting. What are you all shouting?” Bruce asked the audience, to which they collectively shouted back in unison: “IT’S A LOAN.”
“It’s not a loan, it is a discount”
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) April 7, 2022
“What are you all shouting? They’re saying it’s a loan”@Greghands tries to explain to the #bbcqt audience why the government’s £200 energy discount is not a loan. pic.twitter.com/jstBCNxD9H
Still, Hands tried to defend his error in vain. He said: “It’s taken back through a levy. It’s not a loan it doesn’t create an obligation on the individual to repay.”
To which Bruce replied: “But they still have to pay it back, what’s the difference?” Hands then switched tact, claiming: “The individual does not have an obligation to repay.”
However, when Bruce queried whether “we don’t have to pay it back if we don’t want to”, Hands simply replied: “No, I’m not saying that”, leading to a further eruption of laughter from the audience.
Fellow panel member Emily Thornberry, Labour MP chimed in with bemusement: “If you don’t heat yourself you don’t have to pay it back? That’s it isn’t it? That’s what you’re saying.”
This comical exchange followed a perplexing statement from Hands in which he stated that despite his earlier statements that fracking has no place in the British economy, the UK government are “keeping their options open” on fracking.
He further confirmed that they have asked the British Geological Survey to see if the “science has changed”.
The “godfather of climate science”, James Hansen, has previously stated: “The science is crystal clear, we need to phase out fossil fuels starting with the most damaging, the unconventional fossil fuels such as tar sands and fracking.”
Meanwhile, the 2021 IPCC report issued a “code red for humanity” if urgent action is not taken to reduce the world’s climate emissions.
Despite this, Hands today stated the Scottish Government should be “more supportive” of the North Sea oil and gas sector.
On Thursday, Holyrood’s Energy Secretary Michael Matheson said: “Our position is very clear on nuclear, we don’t believe nuclear needs to be part of future energy mix here in Scotland and we have got no intention of taking forward nuclear developments.”
He added: “My concern is if the UK Government are so wedded to developing further nuclear sites, not only is there environmental risk associated with that but it is likely to drive up the costs of people’s household bills.
“Renewables are actually much, much cheaper and dropping in price and will help to lower people’s bills instead.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel