POLLING ahead of the French presidential election indicates that the contest may be too close to call, with the far-right Marine Le Pen gaining ground on incumbent French President Emmanuel Macron.
Earlier this week, an Ipsos Sopra Steria Cevipof poll for Le Monde newspaper suggested that Macron would lead in the first round of voting on April 10 with 26.4% of the vote versus 21.5% for Le Pen, followed by a victory for Macron in the second round on April 24 by 54% to 46%.
However, with only two days remaining until the first round, the New Statesman magazine has reported that new YouGov/Datapraxis polling shows the gap closing, with Macron on 26% in the first round and Le Pen on 23%.
Datapraxis founder Paul Hilder commented: “All our data suggests the second round is now too close to call.
“Le Pen’s reserves – people on the fence for the second round, but who think Macron would be worse – are more positive about her and could mobilise more easily, while Macron’s supposed reserves – many left voters amongst them – mostly hate him too. He is close to his ceiling, but she has room to grow. Whatever happens, this will be the best result ever for the French far-right.”
Polling also indicates that the election’s other two most prominent candidates – the left-wing Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who has pledged to reintroduce a wealth tax ended by Macron’s government and to lower the retirement age to 60, and the far-right commentator Éric Zemmour, who has run on an anti-migrant, anti-Islamic platform – would not qualify for the second round of voting, provoking speculation over who their supporters may vote for in a runoff.
A contrary outcome was forecast by what appeared to be an outlier poll by the Swiss newspaper Le Temps, which not only showed Macron failing to make it past the first round, but predicted that Zemmour would defeat Mélenchon in the second. However, following the poll’s wide circulation, Le Temps this week issued a statement on social media denying that the newspaper had ordered any polling on the French presidential election and raising doubts about the poll’s veracity.
French markets have responded nervously to the prospect of a close race, with bonds sliding sharply on April 6, followed by the CAC 40 stock index underperforming the rest of Europe by almost 1.3%.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here