THE leader of the SNP in Glasgow has said she will step down if the party loses May’s council election.
Susan Aitken took over as the leader of Glasgow City Council in 2017, heading up an SNP minority administration.
While a recent poll suggested 44% of those asked would vote for the SNP on May 5, Aitken told The Herald on Monday she would quit as the head of the party’s delegation if she was not the leader of the council following the election.
The party in Glasgow would need a “fresh start”, Aitken said.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories suspend Robbie Withey as candidate after throat-grab video
“If the SNP were to lose the election and as a consequence of that I was no longer leader of the council, I would also stand down as leader of the SNP group,” she said.
“Because at that point clearly, the group would need the opportunity to have a fresh start and to rebuild, and I think new leadership would be important in that respect.
“I am confident that I have colleagues who more than have the capacity and ability to take on that role.”
The comment comes as Aitken did not rule out a formal coalition with Labour councillors – saying that would be more likely than an agreement with the Scottish Greens.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has repeatedly ruled out formal coalitions with other parties in favour working together on a vote-by-vote basis.
“Anas Sarwar has said Labour won’t do any deals with the SNP. I think that is very foolish I’ve got to say,” Aitken told the newspaper.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross not standing up for communities - but for his own interests
“There are some pretty well functioning SNP and Labour administrations, Edinburgh, East Renfrewshire, Stirling, Dumfries and Galloway, Fife. There’s quite a few of them.”
She added: “If our Labour colleagues were up for something constructive, mature conversations about how we move forward for the good of the city, then we would be happy to have those conversations with them too.
"Whether they are in that space or not, I’m not sure. It’s up to them.”
While the SNP group leader admitted it was “pretty unlikely” a deal could be struck between her party and Labour, she said she “wouldn’t rule anything out”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel