A TORY MP and former minister has sparked outrage after claiming the conviction of his fellow MP Imran Ahmad Khan was a “dreadful miscarriage of justice”.
On Monday evening, Crispin Blunt posted online about the conviction after the Wakefield MP was found guilty on Monday of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old boy in 2008.
Shortly before the Reigate MP deleted his statement on Tuesday, a senior Tory source said his views were “wholly unacceptable” and “we expect the statement to be retracted first thing this morning”.
Blunt has yet to explain why he deleted the message or whether he still holds the view he expressed on Monday.
Khan was thrown out of the Conservative Party following the verdict.
Blunt’s defence of Khan and members of a cross-party LGBT group that the Reigate MP chairs have quit in protest, with some urging him to resign from his role.
Anneliese Dodds, Labour Party chairwoman and shadow equalities secretary, labelled Blunt’s comments “disgraceful”.
She called on Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Tory chairman Oliver Dowden to “take action” against the former prisons minister and “distance their party from his comments”.
Members of the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on Global LGBT+ Rights, including Labour MP Chris Bryant and the SNP’s Stewart McDonald, Martin Docherty-Hughes and Joanna Cherry, said they were quitting the cross-party body which Blunt chairs.
Bryant described the remarks as “completely inappropriate”.
Urging Blunt to quit as APPG chair, McDonald tweeted: “Parliament needs a respected and robust LGBT group and Crispin can no longer provide that leadership.
“He should stand down,” the MP for Glasgow South added.
Cherry tweeted that Blunt’s statement was the “last straw” for her membership of the group and that she intended to resign on Tuesday.
I’ve stayed a member of the APPG on Global LGBT Rights against my better judgment mainly because I was determined not to be bullied out as a gender critical lesbian but chair Crispin Blunt’s statement tonight is the last straw. I’ll be resigning tomorrow.
— Joanna Cherry QC (@joannaccherry) April 11, 2022
Docherty-Hughes added: Given this utterly inappropriate intervention by Crispin Blunt, I have informed the secretariat of the @APPGLGBT of my resignation as a Vice Chair & member of the APPG. It’s time for the Chair to go."
In a now-deleted statement published on his website, Blunt, who came out as gay in 2010, said the jury’s decision was “nothing short of an international scandal”.
A jury at Southwark Crown Court took about five hours to decide Khan, 48, was guilty of sexually assaulting a teenage boy, who is now 29.
The court heard how Khan, a gay Muslim elected to Parliament in 2019, forced the then-teenager to drink gin and tonic, dragged him upstairs, pushed him on to a bed and asked him to watch pornography before the attack at a house in Staffordshire in January 2008.
But Blunt, who was at the London court on Monday, said the case “relied on lazy tropes about LGBT+ people” and argued the result had “dreadful wider implications” for LGBT Muslims “around the world”.
The Tory MP said: “I am utterly appalled and distraught at the dreadful miscarriage of justice that has befallen my friend and colleague Imran Ahmad Khan, MP for Wakefield since December 2019.
“His conviction today is nothing short of an international scandal, with dreadful wider implications for millions of LGBT+ Muslims around the world.
“I sat through some of the trial. The conduct of this case relied on lazy tropes about LGBT+ people that we might have thought we had put behind us decades ago.
“As a former justice minister, I was prepared to testify about the truly extraordinary sequence of events that has resulted in Imran being put through this nightmare start to his parliamentary career.”
Sir Peter Bottomley, the father of the House of Commons who also attended court on Monday, said the final jury verdict should be “respected”.
The veteran Tory MP said he chose to attend the trial “most days” as “no-one should be alone in court”.
He told PA news agency: “It was not the verdict I anticipated.
“Unless overturned on appeal, the jury verdict following the summing up has to be respected.”
Khan’s legal team said he plans to appeal the verdict.
A Tory spokesman, when asked whether the party agreed with Blunt’s view, reiterated that Khan had been expelled from Boris Johnson’s outfit.
“Our view is pretty clear,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel