A BBC presenter has dismissed as a “smokescreen” Boris Johnson’s attack on the corporation over its coverage of the Tory administration.
The Prime Minister claimed both the broadcaster and senior members of the clergy had been “less vociferous” in their condemnation of Vladimir Putin than they had about plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.
His comments, at a private meeting with Tories in Parliament on Tuesday night, came as he sought to shift attention away from his apology for breaking coronavirus rules by attending his lockdown-busting birthday party in the Cabinet Room in June 2020.
Sources close to the Prime Minister said he told Tory MPs in a private meeting it was a “good policy” despite some “criticism on the BBC and from senior members of the clergy” who he said “had been less vociferous in their condemnation on Easter Sunday of Putin than they were on our policy of illegal immigrants”.
BBC presenter Sima Kotecha, the UK editor of Newsnight, fired back at the Prime Minister on social media.
She pointed out the Prime Minister has not “put his life at risk” as BBC journalists such as Clive Myrie, Lyse Doucet and Jeremy Bowen have while reporting in Ukraine.
Kotecha added: “It’s a smokescreen isn’t it?”
Can you mention time when Prime Minister has put his life at risk like @BowenBBC has, like @bbclysedoucet has, like @CliveMyrieBBC has? It’s a smokescreen isn’t it? @JustinOnWeb asking govt minister about PM’s comments regarding #BBC (see below) #r4today pic.twitter.com/IXPtsex3t2
— Sima Kotecha (@sima_kotecha) April 20, 2022
READ MORE: Douglas Ross to dodge vote on 'lying' probe into Boris Johnson
On BBC Radio 4’s Today on Wednesday, presenter Justin Webb challenged business minister Paul Scully about his boss’s comments.
Scully said he had “not seen a lot of the coverage” on the BBC about the plan to send some asylum seekers who arrive in the UK on a one-way trip to Rwanda for processing “because I was away over the weekend”.
Webb said: “He apparently made the point to Conservative MPs that the BBC and the Archbishop (of Canterbury) were not focusing enough on Vladimir Putin.
“I just wonder, can you come up with an occasion when Boris Johnson has put his life on the line for the truth – as (BBC correspondents) Jeremy Bowen has, as Lyse Doucet has, as Clive Myrie has?”
Johnson faces the prospect of a Commons vote on Thursday on whether a parliamentary committee should investigate claims he lied to the House.
Scully said: “It’s not something I can particularly comment on … in terms of the fact that … his approach to his view on the BBC’s approach to Putin.”
Webb suggested it was a “smokescreen” and Johnson was “attacking people he really ought not to be attacking”.
Scully said: “I don’t remember the comment particularly, I’m just trying to explain the context that I believe he may have been trying to make.”
He acknowledged there had been some “excellent coverage from the BBC and elsewhere” on the ground in Ukraine.
“I’m not attacking the BBC, I’m here joining you,” he told Today.
Meanwhile, the Church of England’s head of news John Bingham said if the reports of Johnson’s behind-closed-doors comment were true it was a “disgraceful slur”.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, had publicly condemned Putin’s invasion of Ukraine as an “act of great evil”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel