THE Tory government is aiming to delay a vote on an investigation into whether Boris Johnson lied to Parliament over the partygate scandal.
The Prime Minister will be on an official trip to India when a Labour-led motion calling for a parliamentary investigation into whether he lied to the Commons takes place on Thursday.
The Conservative leader tried to avoid discussing partygate with reporters on the flight to Gujarat, as he vowed to fight the next election no matter how many times he is fined for breaching Covid laws.
The Government has tabled an amendment to defer the vote on the Commons inquiry until the Metropolitan Police’s own probe into lockdown-busting parties in Downing Street and Whitehall has concluded, and the Sue Gray report has been published.
This will allow MPs “to have all the facts at their disposal” when they make a decision, it said.
It is understood that all Tory MPs are being whipped to support the amendment.
A Labour source claimed that any Conservative supporting the amendment would be “voting for a cover up”.
Yet former Conservative minister Andrew Mitchell suggested on Wednesday evening that the PM could be referred to the Privileges Committee without a vote.
He told ITV’s Peston programme: “I don’t think there will be a vote tomorrow. I think the House of Commons will agree to refer it to the Privileges Committee.
“I shan’t be there – quite a lot of my colleagues are heading off either tonight or tomorrow morning to their constituency. We expect this matter to be referred to the Privileges Committee, and I think the Government will go along with it.
“After all, if you look down the years, references to the Privileges Committee have normally gone through on the nod.”
Tories were facing pressure to back the opposition bid for a parliamentary investigation after Johnson was fined by police over a birthday event in 2020.
READ MORE: 'Pinocchio' Prime Minister: Boris Johnson told to 'pack his bags and go'
Asked on the plane to Gujarat whether he would fight the next General Election, the Prime Minister replied: “Of course.”
Pressed on whether there were no circumstances under which he would consider resigning, Johnson told journalists travelling with him: “Not a lot that spring to mind at the moment.
“But if you want to sketch some out I’m sure you could entertain your viewers with some imaginary circumstances in which I might have to resign, but I don’t propose to go into them, I can’t think of them right now.”
Speaking to reporters in India on Thursday, he denied that he misled Parliament over Downing Street parties during lockdown.
Asked on the first day of his trade mission whether he knowningly or unknowingly misled Parliament, Johnson said: “Of course not”.
Speaking ahead of the Commons vote, the Prime Minister said: “They [MPs] must do whatever they want. That is their prerogative.”
Johnson’s aides are braced for him to receive multiple fines, having already been handed one fixed-penalty notice for the gathering on his 56th birthday.
He is thought to have been at six of the 12 events under investigation by Scotland Yard.
Johnson continued: “Politics has taught me one thing which is you’re better off talking and focusing on the things that matter, the things that make a real difference to the electorate and not about politicians themselves.”
Asked if that meant partygate did not matter to the public, he said: “You’re better off talking about things other than politicians themselves, is my view.”
When MPs vote on Thursday, Conservatives will be urged to back the Government’s amendment to delay making a decision on whether to launch a Commons inquiry until all other investigations finish.
Johnson sought to justify the position, which comes after Tory MP Craig Whittaker called for him to refer himself to an investigation to end the saga.
Asked why he would not submit himself to an inquiry if he had nothing to hide, Johnson said: “I think the best thing is if the investigation is concluded. There’s a police investigation that has not concluded. We have to wait for that and then for Sue Gray to have her final say.”
Pressed if he would back an inquiry after that point, he said: “I think we need to wait and see where it gets.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The Government has tabled an amendment to Labour’s motion which says that consideration of this matter should take place after the conclusion of the police investigation, and the publication of the Cabinet Office report, allowing MPs to have all the facts at their disposal.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel