DOUGLAS Ross has repeatedly refused to say if he would vote to send Boris Johnson to the privileges committee for an investigation into whether he misled Parliament.
The Scottish Tory leader was speaking to the press after a disastrous FMQs where Nicola Sturgeon branded him “ridiculous” for supporting the Prime Minister.
Ross had originally called for the PM to resign if he was found to have broken the rules – but later U-turned despite the fixed penalty notice given to Johnson and cited the Ukraine crisis as his reason for backing him.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford 'feels sorry' for Douglas Ross over PM support
The Prime Minister is in India on an official visit as MPs in the House of Commons are debating a Labour-led motion calling for a parliamentary investigation into whether he lied to the chamber.
The debate is set to go on until 5pm on Thursday, with Tory MPs given a free vote on whether to refer the PM for the probe.
The UK Government has withdrawn a counter motion which would have deferred a vote on whether to send Boris Johnson to the committee until after the Sue Gray report is published.
SNP shadow Commons leader Pete Wishart described the move as a "supreme effort of kicking the can down the road".
After a heated FMQs in Holyrood Ross spoke to reporters outside of the chamber. The National asked if he was “dodging Westminster” and the debate by being in Holyrood.
Ross replied: “It’s physically impossible to get from the Holyrood chamber finishing FMQs at 12.45pm to get down to London for a vote at 5pm and I’m not even certain there will be a vote.
“The Government have removed their amendment or not pushed their amendment and it may be pushed through without any division at all.
“I've also been very clear that it’s good we’ll have the privileges committee looking into this, getting all the information into the public domain and answering the questions that still remain on this issue.”
He also said that he hadn’t been in Westminster on a Thursday “for a couple of years” and said it would be “unusual” if he was.
Ross was then asked three times how he would vote if he had been able to make it to Westminster.
At first he said: “Again the situation from last night is different than this morning, I welcome the fact that the amendment has not been put forward and it looks like this will go to the privileges committee so a group of members of parliament can look at this, can look at the evidence and can seek answers for the questions that remained over this issue.”
READ MORE: ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW - Will Boris Johnson survive vote on whether he lied to Commons?
Asked a second time Ross said “there may not even be a vote”.
When The National pointed out he still hadn’t answered the question and asked a third time he said: “I think it’s important, I can’t say how I would vote if there wouldn’t even be a division.
“This is how the Westminster parliament works if there is no amendment and it goes through without division then there is no vote at all.”
The Prime Minister has so far avoided discussing the vote with the press pool accompanying him to India.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel