THE damning findings of Sue Gray’s partygate report could be terminal for Boris Johnson's reign, according to a Downing Street insider.
Gray, a senior civil servant, was forced to delay the publication of her investigation into parties held in Downing Street and Whitehall during England’s coronavirus lockdowns due to the Metropolitan Police commencing their own inquiry.
It comes as discontented backbenchers plot a fresh move to remove their leader if local election results are poor or he receives further fines.
In an interim report published in January, the Cabinet Office official said there had been “failures of leadership and judgment” in No 10 over the so-called partygate saga.
READ MORE: Labour grandee in Lords plot to block indyref2 with UK veto over Holyrood
The Times, citing an official it described as being familiar with the contents of the complete report, said Gray’s full findings were even more personally critical of the Prime Minister and could end his premiership.
According to the paper, the official said: “Sue’s report is excoriating. It will make things incredibly difficult for the Prime Minister.
“There’s an immense amount of pressure on her — her report could be enough to end him.”
No 10 declined to comment.
Meanwhile, the i newspaper reports that Conservative rebels are preparing to oust Johnson in the event of a poor showing at the local elections next month or if further fines are issued to him.
Scotland Yard has already fined Johnson, along with his wife Carrie and Chancellor Rishi Sunak, for attending his 56th birthday bash held in June 2020 when Covid rules banned indoor gatherings.
Downing Street is said to be braced for Johnson to receive a second fixed-penalty notice (FPN) after police reportedly began issuing fines relating to a “bring your own bottle” drinks do in the No 10 garden on May 20, 2020.
He reportedly attended half of the 12 gatherings being probed by police.
Cabinet ministers on Sunday offered a defence of the Prime Minister, with Conservative Party chairman Oliver Dowden suggesting it was “quite a speculation” to predict Johnson could be hit with more FPNs.
He and Brexit opportunities minister Jacob Rees-Mogg backed Johnson to lead the Tories into the next general election, which is currently scheduled for no later than January 2025.
READ MORE: North east Scotland 'robbed of £1.7 billion' by the Tories, SNP say
Dowden told Sky News there was a “very strong case for the Prime Minister remaining in office” despite mounting pressure from his own backbenches for him to quit.
Senior backbenchers, including former minister Steve Baker, have put their head above the parapet in recent weeks to call for Johnson to vacate Downing Street following his handling of the rule-breaking allegations.
According to the i, the PM’s critics have begun working in a co-ordinated fashion and are “holding back” to wait for the local election results or for further FPNs to arrive in Johnson’s inbox.
The paper cited other reports that some rebels have prepared no confidence letters to be submitted en masse to the 1922 Committee of backbench Tory MPs should the party take a battering at the polls on May 5.
Dowden has admitted that the council elections will be “challenging”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel