A NEWSPAPER editor who published a widely condemned article about deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner has refused to meet with the Commons speaker over the report.
Mail on Sunday chief David Dillon rejected a request from Sir Lindsay Hoyle after he told MPs on Monday he had arranged a meeting following an outcry over claims Rayner crossed and uncrossed her legs during Prime Minister’s Questions to distract Boris Johnson. The report likened her actions to those of Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct.
In his response to the Speaker, published in the Daily Mail, Dillon said he would not be attending as journalists should “not take instruction from officials of the House of Commons, however august they may be”.
READ MORE: IPSO receives 5500 complaints over Angela Rayner Mail article
In his letter, he wrote: “The Mail on Sunday deplores sexism and misogyny in all its forms. However journalists must be free to report what they are told by MPs about conversations which take place in the House of Commons, however unpalatable some may find them.”
He said that while The Mail on Sunday had “the greatest possible respect both for your office and for Parliament [which] along with a free press they are the foundation stones of British democracy”, the invitation would be declined.
Wednesday's @DailymailUK #MailFrontPages pic.twitter.com/N4XGxgaSmX
— Daily Mail U.K. (@DailyMailUK) April 26, 2022
Mail journalist Andrew Pierce said newspaper bosses had told the Speaker to "get stuffed" and claimed Rayner had previously joked about the Basic Instinct comparison.
He told GB News: “We put a report in the Mail today – she appeared on a podcast with Matt Ford in January, laughing and joking about the Sharon Stone comparison, offering up herself, crossing and crossing her legs, causing great laughter in the audience.
“Where was the outrage? The outrage was confected.”
He added: "It's not for the Speaker of the House of Commons to tell a newspaper or this TV station what they kind of can't broadcast or report. So, we said very politely – get stuffed, we're not going.”
Those claims were rubbished by Rayner. Responding to the latest Daily Mail report, she said it “implies today that I somehow enjoy being subjected to sexist slurs. I don’t. They are mortifying and deeply hurtful”.
The Mail implies today that I somehow enjoy being subjected to sexist slurs.
— Angela Rayner 🌹 (@AngelaRayner) April 27, 2022
I don’t.
They are mortifying and deeply hurtful.
Earlier, in a statement, Hoyle said he wanted to use the meeting to ask that “we are all a little kinder”, issuing a plea to reporters to consider the feelings of MPs and their families when covering stories in Parliament.
He made the point that he had only recently rejected calls to remove the parliamentary pass from another journalist after some MPs called for The Mail on Sunday’s political editor Glen Owen – who wrote the report about Rayner – to have his pass removed.
“I am a staunch believer and protector of press freedom, which is why when an MP asked me to remove the pass of a sketch writer last week for something he had written, I said ‘no’,” he said.
“I firmly believe in the duty of reporters to cover Parliament, but I would also make a plea – nothing more – for the feelings of all MPs and their families to be considered, and the impact on their safety, when articles are written. I would just ask that we are all a little kinder.
“That is what I wanted to talk about at tomorrow’s meeting.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson and Nadine Dorries panned for 'copy and paste' message to Angela Rayner
Appearing on ITV’s Lorraine programme on Tuesday, Rayner said she had appealed to the paper not to run the story, based on claims by an unnamed Tory MP.
“When I heard the story was coming out and we rebutted it instantly… like this is disgusting, it’s completely untrue, please don’t run a story like that,” she said.
“All I worry about when I’m at the despatch box is doing a good job and being able to do justice to my constituents and the work I’m doing, so I was just really crestfallen that somebody had said that to a paper and a paper was reporting that.”
Rayner has also called on the Prime Minister to give assurances he would take action against the MP who made the comment after vowing to unleash "the terrors of the earth" if they were identified.
"I hope to hear what he’ll be doing about it today," Rayner said ahead of PMQs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel