A LEADING left-wing commentator has given his backing to independence – despite being a member of the pro-Union Labour Party.
Author and journalist Paul Mason said he was “sure” he would vote to leave the UK in a second independence referendum.
He was speaking on the pro-independence online channel Scotonomics when he made the comments.
READ MORE: Labour candidate disciplined after 'anti-Catholic' tweet revealed
Mason, a former BBC and Channel 4 journalist, said: “If I lived in Scotland and was a Scottish national person, with a Scottish identity and could vote, I’m sure I would vote Yes in a referendum.
We had a great conversation with @paulmasonnews. The interview aires on Wednesday 8 pm: https://t.co/eEgPNj2aa5 Extended interview is available on our Patreon. Here Paul talks about Labour's likely approach to the constitutional question. pic.twitter.com/kcVQWCrFnW
— Scotonomics (@Scotonomics1) April 22, 2022
“But I don’t and I’m stuck with the problem of being an English socialist, living in London and basically a permanent Tory government.”
But he added that the best scenario the Labour Party, of which he is a member, could offer was federalism or devo-max.
Devo-max would see all powers currently reserved to the UK parliament devolved to Holyrood, except for foreign affairs, defence and monetary policy.
READ MORE: 'Ultra-Unionist' group unveils anti-SNP billboards across Scottish cities
He added: “The party that I am a member of, the best thing, probably the maximum it’s going to offer is federation.
“And I think it should offer federation at the first gambit, i.e. everything except foreign, defence and, unfortunately monetary, unless you’re prepared to go for a Scottish currency, if a no-fault separation in the referendum goes Yes.”
He went on to argue that “economic hardship” was not the main driver of the rise of the far-right globally in recent years, arguing it was instead the “breakdown of…neoliberalism”.
“Neoliberalism, in my mind, broke down in 2008, it’s main springs blew apart,” he said.
“There’s no spontaneous mode of accumulation, dynamo of production anymore. It’s all kept alive by quantitative easing and debt.”
Mason had previously urged Labour to embrace independence and described the idea as a "very exciting prospect" in a 2021 Question Time appearance.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel