SCOTLAND'S missed oil opportunities are under the spotlight as campaigners call for Rishi Sunak to nationalise the UK energy sector.
As the biggest energy companies record £7 billion in profits, the country's poorest families face the worst cost-of-living crisis in decades - and anti-privatisation group We Own It (WOI) is calling for a windfall tax on energy suppliers.
The campaigners' petition is calling for a permanent windfall tax of 56% on energy firms while also demanding the UK Government stop “wasting money bailing out failing energy supply giants” and for Sunak to “set up a publicly owned energy supplier instead”.
And with the vast majority of UK oil being found in Scottish waters, the energy scandal has given an edge to arguments supporting independence, with many highlighting missed opportunities from Scotland’s oil resources.
WOI is not the only group up in arms over the current energy crisis with a number of Scottish political parties slating the Tories' energy tax policies.
Commenting on the oil and gas businesses' “obscene” profits, Scottish Greens energy and climate spokesperson Mark Ruskell said: “The tax contribution these firms are complaining about is a drop in the North Sea cash cow, and they should be expected to contribute more.
“I welcome the fact that the case for a windfall tax has finally reached the Treasury in-tray, and I hope the UK Government will also recognise that to achieve energy security and address the cost of living and climate crises we need to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels with their volatile prices and invest in clean renewable energy, creating long term jobs for the future.”
Our North Sea neighbour
Comparisons are often drawn between Scotland and Norway, a country that used its North Sea oil profits to set up a sovereign wealth fund for its citizens.
The Scandinavian country chose to invest all surplus revenue from its oil and gas sector into a public pension fund, which amounted to $250,000 per citizen as of December 2021.
And our Norwegian neighbour collects significantly more tax from energy companies. Firms in Norway pay a corporation rate of 22% and a special levy of 56% which effectively amounts to a permanent windfall tax - the kind campaigners are calling for in the UK.
The progressive Norwegian rates mean that for every £8 the UK collects in tax on barrels of oil, Norway takes £100.
Norway has also taken the opportunity to invest in developing its hydropower resources, resulting in 98% of the country’s energy being renewable.
Norway's relative success in handling its natural resources becomes all the more apparent in light of the McCrone report - a document made public in 2005 and written in 1974 on behalf of the UK Government - which gave a positive economic forecast for an independent Scotland, largely due to its oil potential. The report stated Scotland would have a "chronic surplus to a quite embarrassing degree and its currency would become the hardest in Europe".
A radically different approach was taken in the UK, where private companies and shareholders were the direct beneficiaries of oil reserves.
For every £100 Norway collects in tax on barrels of oil in the North Sea, in the UK we collect only £8
— We Own It (@We_OwnIt) April 29, 2022
Rishi Sunak has now opened the door to a windfall tax on oil and gas companies
Sign and share our petition
👉https://t.co/WvfGzQidoL pic.twitter.com/YhuMZWGdXe
"This is a national scandal"
Commenting on the current state of the UK’s energy policy, Alba party leader Alex Salmond said: “One third of households are right now being plunged into fuel poverty in the all-energy capital of Europe. This is a national scandal which cannot be allowed to stand.
“Scotland is five times self-sufficient in oil and gas and can already power every home in the country from renewable electricity.
“In what universe, therefore, does rising hydrocarbon prices make Scots poorer?
“Why has the 54% hike in Scottish electricity bills been dictated by the world price of gas?
“The reality is that our resources are controlled by international capital, the revenues are appropriated by Westminster and Scots are left to pick up the tab.”
The SNP have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel