A “BATTLE of wills” is expected to take place in Labour over Anas Sarwar’s decision to rule out formal coalitions, as councillors across Scotland begin days of haggling to form administrations.
The election resulted in a total of 27 out of 32 councils with no overall control, with the SNP and Labour each securing a majority in one and independents forming a majority in three.
Now days of negotiations will take place in “the modern equivalent of smoke-filled rooms” over issues such as budgets.
One key campaign issue has been Sarwar’s hostility to coalitions with the SNP – despite the rival parties previously running councils including Edinburgh, Fife and Stirling – which was criticised by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon as “politically immature”.
READ MORE: Andrew Tickell: The media will crown Anas Sarwar - despite his clear lack of savvy
Dr Jonathan Carr-West, chief executive of think-tank the Local Government Information Unit (LGiU), said local Labour leaders were likely to be taking a different stance from their leader.
He said: “The thing which is slightly strange is that although the Scottish system creates no overall control by design, you might think there would be some kind of system for how those negotiations work that was more formalised or more set out than in other parts of the UK.
“But actually there is not, so it all gets kind of opaque at this point.
“Essentially what people will do is disappear initially into their political groups to talk about what they think they can do and what they are willing and not willing to accept.”
He added: “There is additional tensions this year as the Scottish Labour leadership has been very clear that they don’t want to go into coalition with the SNP.
“But I suspect everything we are hearing from local leaders is that is not the attitude they are going to take.
“Much more, local leaders have been saying, ‘look, we will do what is best on the ground and make decisions on what works best for this place and what can happen’.
“So there could be an interesting battle of wills between the national leadership and the local leadership in Labour for some of these things.”
The SNP are the largest group in 21 local authorities and Sturgeon has said she is “open” to replicating the power-sharing agreement with the Greens at Holyrood in council chambers, but will leave decisions up to local leaders.
Yesterday, SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford also said the party would seek to work with others who “have a progressive outlook”.
He told BBC Radio Scotland: “I think it’s quite clear when I use that word ‘progressive’ that there is one party which doesn’t fit that mode and that is the Conservative Party.”
The SNP could seek to form a coalition with the Greens in Glasgow and the continuation of a successful SNP and Labour coalition in Edinburgh is another possibility.
While in Fife, the success of the LibDems in gaining more seats could mean the SNP teaming up with that party instead of Labour as before.
Carr-West added: “People will disappear into the modern equivalent of smoke-filled rooms, they will decide what they think they will do and start negotiating with each other around this.
“I think we will tend to see [outcomes] in days rather than weeks.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel