PRO-choice campaigners have further criticised an SNP MSP after he claimed abortion was “not difficult”.
John Mason has sparked outrage in recent days after making a string of controversial claims about abortion clinics on social media and defending anti-abortion “vigils” that have sprung up outside Glasgow hospitals.
He claimed clinics "push abortion without laying out the pros and cons" and went on to say he believed termination was “seldom essential or vital”.
The Glasgow Shettleston MSP also said he “did not see anything hateful or harassing” about signs people held at pro-life protests.
But despite a fierce backlash, he has continued to get into debates with women online on the issue and has come in for further condemnation after saying abortion “does not appear to be difficult”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon to visit US ahead of planned independence vote
In response to a Lauren Kelly on Twitter, who said the process of getting an abortion was not easy, Mason hit back saying: “You say getting an abortion is not easy. But there have been 9.4 million abortions in UK since 1967. That is one for every 8 people. It does not appear to be difficult.”
Kelly had said: “Do you know how difficult it is to go through an abortion. The process to get one is not exactly easy and you can’t just turn up to a clinic on the day and request one. These places don’t force abortions, rather they don't try to sway the mind of someone at a time they are vulnerable.”
Mason has also confessed to attending one of the “vigils” to speak to people there.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon called out her party colleague and said his comments were “wrong” and she does not agree with his views on abortion.
Lucy Grieve, co-founder of Back Off Scotland, which is campaigning for buffer zones to be implemented around clinics, said Mason’s comments “didn’t make sense” and were an “insult” to patients and staff.
She told The National: “He’s being very ignorant.
“It’s an insult to everyone who has to make that decision as well as to all the staff.
“His comments just don’t make sense. One in three women will have an abortion during their lives and having easily accessible, legal and safe abortion care is a cornerstone of any good healthcare system.
“He’s obviously also admitted in the past attending one of these vigils.
READ MORE: Scottish Football Writers Association sorry after female writers walk out of event
“It’s clear he has absolutely no idea what happens between an abortion provider and the patient so for him to be making comments about this when he’s an elected official is dangerous and it’s not a good look for the SNP.”
Mason told the Scotsman on Monday there is “considerable scepticism” around the requirement for informed consent during medically approved abortions in Scotland despite assurances from medical experts all patients must provide informed consent before going through any medical procedure.
The National has approached Mason directly for comment.
The conversation around abortion rights has intensified over the last week after a leaked document claimed the US Supreme Court is poised to overturn a 1973 decision that legalised abortion across the country.
If the court strikes down the Roe v Wade ruling, individual states would be allowed to ban abortion if they wish.
A demonstration against overturning the ruling is set to be held in Edinburgh on Saturday afternoon outside the US Consulate.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel