SCRAPPING the Human Rights Act will open a “Pandora’s Box of dire consequences”, risking violence in Northern Ireland and endangering women’s safety, the Government has been warned.
More than 50 leading human rights groups including Amnesty International and End Violence Against Women Coalition have signed a letter setting out what impact scrapping the Act would have and called for an urgent meeting with the Prime Minister to discuss the matter.
They said scrapping the Act, as a key piece of legislation underpinning the Good Friday Agreement which brokered a fragile peace in Northern Ireland, could risk violence flaring up in the region.
READ MORE: 'It's not up to them': Tories won't decide if indyref2 goes ahead, says SNP's Kirsten Oswald
Women would also be threatened if the 1998 Act was binned, the organisations warned because the legislation is a key way public bodies are forced to commit to protecting the safety of women.
They said the Human Rights Act enabled the victims of serial rapist John Worboys – who flew under the radar of police – to sue the Metropolitan Police for “inhumane or degrading treatment” suffered by the women at the hands of officers.
It also allowed victims to sue the force because it had failed to properly investigate allegations against Worboys made years before he was brought to justice and had raped potentially more than 100.
Signatories also said scrapping the Act would undermine international law and see the UK mimicking the rhetoric of despotic states such as Russia and Hungary.
In light of the war in Ukraine, the UK would risk undermining its own calls for adherence to international law and human rights adherence if the move went ahead, the letter warned.
Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s CEO, said: “Tearing up the Human Rights Act will unleash a Pandora’s Box of dire consequences for the UK and we desperately urge the Prime Minister to reconsider.
“Not only will repealing the Human Rights Act damage the UK’s international reputation, but it will also undermine the global system of rights and protections and our ability to hold other countries to account, just at a time when we have never needed those protections more.
“The Human Rights Act is a cornerstone of the Good Friday Agreement and pulling that pilar away makes the fragile peace there even more unstable.
“It’s also deeply alarming that the Government would choose to remove any obligations on the police to effectively investigate violence against women and girls, at a time when public confidence in that area is already in crisis.
READ MORE: UN demands immediate release of Scot locked up in India
“The Human Rights Act is the most significant piece of rights legislation in the UK and it plays an absolutely vital role in ensuring stability, justice and protection at home and abroad. This is no time to replace it with a watered-down substitute.”
It comes the day before the Queen’s Speech, in which the Government sets out its legislative agenda for the next year.
The Government is expected to bring forward plans to scrap the Act on Tuesday.
The Act came into force in 2000 and made into law the rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights.
Tory prime ministers since David Cameron have vowed to scrap the legislation but action has so far stalled.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel