SCOTTISH Conservatives have expressed fears that the SNP will “hijack” an upcoming display of the Declaration of Arbroath at the National Museum of Scotland.
The key document, written by Scottish barons to Pope John XXII in 1320 asking him to recognise the country’s independence and acknowledge Robert the Bruce as king, is being made visible to the public for the first time in 17 years next summer.
The Declaration had been due to go on display for its 700th anniversary in 2020, but this was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Now The Herald has revealed that it will be part of the National Museum’s special exhibitions gallery between June 3 and July 2, 2023. Correspondence revealed in a freedom of information request reveals that it will almost certainly be the last time the document will be able to be displayed in “many years” due to its “fragility”.
Emails between the National Records for Scotland and the National Museum showed that the Declaration exhibition was also planned to be rescheduled for 2021 – but this was abandoned amid Covid fears, and concerns over the display clashing with the Holyrood elections.
One employee said it could be “difficult for us to keep control of the narrative if political parties are launching their campaigns” on the same day as the display.
After searching for new dates, the organisers settled on June 2023 – described as a “suitably secure and environmentally appropriate venue”.
READ MORE: Why a 700-year-old letter to a pope is key to Scotland’s story
But with the Scottish Government planning to hold an independence referendum in 2023 – though there is currently no date set – the Scottish Tories have claimed “eyebrows will be raised” by the timing of the exhibition.
Other correspondence has also shown that Culture Secretary Angus Robertson’s office asked if it was “impossible” to open the display in 2022, but organisers said 2023 would be the “optimum opportunity … allowing a significant Scottish and international audience”.
Sharon Dowey (below), the Scottish Tories’ shadow culture minister, claimed: “[The public] have already made it clear they do not want the SNP to hold another divisive independence referendum and will be concerned that the nationalists might hijack this display.
"It looks as though there has already been ministerial interest in these discussions, showing SNP ministers are looking at ways to interfere in the work of National Museum of Scotland. They must explain why they asked this display to be brought forward to this year and start focusing on the issues that really matter to communities across Scotland.”
A National Museum of Scotland spokesperson argued that the timing had been selected “to fit in with our busy public programme and allow as many people as possible the rare opportunity to see this unique piece of Scotland’s history”.
They went on: “The display has had to be repeatedly reprogrammed due to the Covid pandemic and we have been working to find dates for some time.
“While we are aware that a potential independence referendum for next year has been the subject of discussion since last week’s local election results, no specific timings have been published and there is no reason to reconsider our approach.”
The Declaration of Arbroath – considered one of the country’s most important documents – was last displayed at the Scottish Parliament.
SNP MPs mocked the Tories for their reaction to the document’s upcoming display, describing their responses as “ridiculous”.
READ MORE: The Declaration of Arbroath in Angus and the world
Stewart McDonald, MP for Glasgow South, said: “In a crowded field, the Scottish wing of the Tory party must be their most mind-numbingly ridiculous, paranoid and intellectually void.”
John Nicolson, the party’s culture spokesperson at Westminster, added: “Tory folly on display too as the Declaration of Arbroath to be displayed for first time in 17 years. Is there a more ridiculous ‘party’ than the @ScotTories?”
Mhairi Hunter, who lost her seat on Glasgow City Council last week, also commented: “This is a completely absurd row. The Declaration of Arbroath is a hugely important part of our history, no matter your views on independence. It's pretty miraculous that it has survived all these centuries. It will be amazing to see it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel