ANAS Sarwar has insisted independence would not make Scotland a "fairer" country as voters urged him to change his stance on the issue.
The Labour leader was a guest on the BBC's Debate Night show on Wednesday and said he "genuinely believed" leaving the UK would not make Scotland more equal and demand for independence would fall if the UK simply disposed of the Tory government at Westminster.
A voter in the audience said he didn't feel he could vote for Labour because they were denying people the chance to have a conversation about independence and encouraged Sarwar to adopt a more neutral standpoint.
Singer and trade unionist Iona Fyfe, who was also on the panel, backed him up and said she might have felt she could vote for Sarwar's party if they stood more in the middle on independence.
Sarwar said: "I get lots of people saying to me Labour would win elections, Labour would knock it out the park if only they supported independence.
READ MORE: More than 100 fines issued for partygate in latest Met Police announcement
"I genuinely don’t believe independence would make our country fairer, I don’t think it would make it more equal, I don’t think it would give us the right role in terms of how we punch above our weight not just in the UK but right around the world.
"The big contest we face right now is not a referendum contest, the big challenge we’re going to face in the run-up to the general election is a campaign to boot out Boris Johnson."
Fyfe said it was clear Scotland wanted to take its own future into its own hands, given Holyrood has a majority of independence-supporting MSPs.
She told Sarwar: "As a trade unionist and someone who is very involved in the musicians union, maybe growing up I would’ve been a Labour voter if they were more neutral on independence.
"But we see a mandate of 62 SNP seats last year in Holyrood, and there is now a Green and SNP coalition, and this result last week shows people are not voting for beergate, not for partygate, not for all of this corrupt PPE scandals, we’re done with that.
"We want to take our future in our own hands. And for me, maybe I would’ve been a Labour voter growing up, but I’m not."
Sarwar replied: "That's like saying we should’ve been neutral on Brexit. I think Brexit has been bad for the UK. Why should we stay neutral on something that we believe is wrong for our country?
"I’m going to argue what I think is best for Scotland. I believe if we can get rid of this out-of-touch, arrogant, corrupt Tory government, I believe demand for independence would fall."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel