AN unelected peer squirmed in a public debate as he was asked whether fighting talk of independence would be easier if Boris Johnson was not Prime Minister.
Offord, who was elevated to the House of Lords and made a Scotland Office minister by Johnson, was asked whether he thought the Prime Minister was the greatest recruiting sergeant for independence on the BBC's Debate Night Show on Wednesday.
But while admitting Johnson was not popular north of the border, he dodged the question and instead suggested Holyrood not having a majority of SNP MSPs meant there was "no appetite" for a referendum.
When asked if he thought Johnson was the greatest recruiting sergeant for independence, Offord said: "Yes it’s a valid question, there’s no question that on the doorsteps there’s a lot of resonance with that point of view but at the end of the day the Holyrood election that John [Nicolson] just referred to the SNP did not get a majority."
When MP Nicolson pointed out Holyrood elections were designed to prevent any party having a majority, Offord replied: "When the 2014 referendum was done Alex Salmond had a majority and there was agreement across Westminster and Holyrood to have that referendum. There’s no appetite in the country to have a referendum."
“Is Boris Johnson the greatest recruiting sergeant for independence?”
— BBC Debate Night (@bbcdebatenight) May 11, 2022
“Boris does not play well in Scotland, we all know that…But we are the United Kingdom at the end of the day”
The Conservative’s Malcolm Offord dismisses another Scottish indyref. #bbcdn pic.twitter.com/gODg84kXda
It emerged earlier this year Offord was formerly director of a firm alongside an international fugitive without his knowledge.
He was the director of Cashmaster International Ltd until November 2021. He had taken a non-executive director’s role after having bought the firm in 2014.
During his time at the company’s head, Offord saw the firm hire, and then promote to director, Matt Jaeger - a fraudster being hunted by Interpol.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says ferries deal sign off came from Derek Mackay not John Swinney
It was Jaeger’s promotion to director - and his subsequent listing on Companies House - that led to his eventual capture and prosecution, The National has been told. Jaeger had reportedly been very hesitant about getting involved in any social media drives which the company was eager to promote.
In 2017, a year after the Scotland Office said the firm had dismissed Jaeger for “gross misconduct”, he was sentenced to 12 months behind bars after he pled guilty to defrauding a Northern Irish woman and her family out of thousands of pounds.
During Wednesday night's show, Offord was pressed further on the independence issue by host Stephen Jardine, who asked if Johnson made it harder for the Tories to fight off discussions about Scotland leaving the UK.
But Offord looked uncomfortable as he stumbled to answer.
He eventually said: "I think at the end of the day, Boris Johnson is the leader and has got qualities. Boris does not play well in Scotland, we all know that.
"But we are a United Kingdom and we have to move forward in this moment of crisis together."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel