THE Alba project “must be over” after a disappointing council election which saw the party fail to win a seat, one of the country’s top political experts has said.
Professor John Curtice was speaking after Alba failed to return any of its 111 candidates to a Scottish council, including the party’s general secretary Chris McEleny.
McEleny (below), who had been seen as the party’s best chance of winning a seat, won 126 first-preference votes in his ward of Inverclyde West.
However, the Alba man insisted his party had “much to be positive about” and that they were “fully committed to continuing our campaign for independence”.
Curtice said that the party, which has sought to carve out a space for itself from the significant pro-independence voting block dominated by the SNP and Greens, had “completely failed”.
He said: “Alex Salmond has completely failed to split the nationalist movement. That attempt to re-road the SNP’s dominance did not work and it must now be over, surely.”
He added: “They’re averaging 2% of the vote. It’s fought two elections and frankly achieved nothing.
"I imagine that, at the moment, its two MPs are going to be out on their ears at the next General Election.”
Alba has two representatives at Westminster in Neale Hanvey and Kenny MacAskill. However, both were elected under the SNP banner and defected ahead of the Holyrood elections in 2021.
READ MORE: The Wee Alba Book: Why the publication deserves to be widely read
Asked if Alba might be laying a solid base on which to build future success and see councillors or even MSPs elected 10 years down the line, Curtice was dismissive.
“They could,” he said. “If they survive that long.
“I think it’s true that you can still find in local government elections Liberal Party candidates, there is still the Social Democratic Party, but these guys do not have any impact or any influence.”
Asked if he was comparing Alba’s future to those two parties, Curtice said: “Well, at least the SDP had some success for a while.”
Responding to Curtice’s comments, McEleny said: “Although we didn’t get the result we hoped for, there is much to be positive about. We successfully fielded 111 candidates across Scotland only a year after we formed.
“From our vote monitoring on the ground at counts across Scotland, Alba was registering around 20% of second-preference votes in seats where there was one SNP candidate, or a similar number of third-preference votes in seats that had two SNP candidates.”
He went on: “Alba are the only party that is putting forward a thought-out plan and a positive vision for independence. For as long as there is inaction on independence and the mainstream parties fail to address the serious nature of the cost-of-living crisis then Alba will be here putting forward the ideas and the policies that Scotland needs right now.
“The SNP have promised that there will be a referendum on independence next year ‘no ifs no buts’, therefore we are fully committed to continuing our campaign for independence as we aim towards that. This is something the SNP must deliver and if they do then the entire Yes movement will unite to campaign for Scotland’s independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel