POLICE Scotland is to pay a former officer almost £1 million after a tribunal found evidence of a “sexist culture” in the organisation.
Former firearms officer Rhona Malone won the payout after a four-year battle which started after a senior member of the force, Keith Warhurst, said he did not want to see two women deployed together “when there are sufficient male staff”.
An Employment Tribunal found a "horrific" workplace culture in the armed policing unit and accepted evidence of an “absolute boys’ club”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon praises firearms officer Rhona Malone on tribunal outcome
The tribunal also found:
- Rachel Coates, a former colleague of Malone, was told by the chief firearms instructor that women should not become authorised firearms officers (AFOs) "because they menstruated and that affected their temperament".
- When Coates asked if women AFOs could wear trousers and a top, rather than a one-piece, so it would be easier to go to the toilet, the chief firearms instructor swore at her.
- Warhurst posted images of topless women to a WhatsApp group of male sergeants. A colleague messaged him and told him it was inappropriate.
- Another former colleague of Malone overheard Warhust calling one of the female Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc) agents "a wee lassie".
- Coates and another colleague, Zara Taylor, left their division as they were "not confident that the sexist culture … was going to change and felt their sex was always going to be a barrier to promotion".
Malone alleged sex discrimination and victimisation. Her victimisation claims succeeded but the discrimination claim was dismissed.
In a joint statement released on Friday, the force and Malone said they had agreed she would be paid £947,909.07 as part of the settlement.
Their statement read: “An Employment Tribunal upheld multiple victimisation claims under the Equality Act 2010 in favour of former Police Constable Rhona Malone in a judgment issued on 5 October, 2021.
“A settlement, including a payment of £947,909.07, has now been agreed which will conclude her legal claim in the Employment Tribunal.
“The Chief Constable has provided a personal apology to Ms Malone for the serious issues highlighted in the Employment Tribunal judgment, including Police Scotland’s poor response when a dedicated and promising officer raised legitimate concerns. The Chief Constable also emphasised his personal commitment to leading change in policing in Scotland which drives equality and inclusion to improve the experiences of all women, including our own officers and staff. The Chief Constable reiterates this apology and commitment.
“In the days after the judgment was issued, the Chief Constable made a commitment to commission an external police service to carry out an independent review of the Employment Tribunal decision and make any recommendations which require action by Police Scotland whether they relate to performance, conduct, or culture. The Police Service of Northern Ireland is finalising that work.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel