A CAMPAIGN group has hit out after a web address associated with their organisation was found to redirect to the Alba Party’s website.
Women For Independence (WFI) said it was “disappointing and disingenuous” that an anonymous figure bought the web domain womenforindependence.scot and made it redirect to a section of Alba’s website outlining the party’s stance on trans rights.
It is not known who is behind the move and Alba have flatly rejected owning the address. Women For Independence’s real website is wfi.scot.
It comes after the women-led independence group hit the headlines this week after ex-treasurer Natalie McGarry was found guilty of embezzling thousands from the group after other members raised concerns about the fraudster to police.
READ MORE: Former SNP MP Natalie McGarry found guilty of embezzling Yes groups' cash
McGarry, the former SNP MP for Glasgow East, faces the threat of imprisonment over the verdict.
The website links to a statement from Alba’s women’s convener Caroline McAllister, which outlines the party’s opposition to proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act. This policy aims to make it easier for trans people to obtain a gender recognition certificate.
However WFI, founded in 2012, is supportive of the proposed reforms which are expected to be debated again in Holyrood in the next year.
It is a contentious issue among some in the independence movement and is a key point of difference between the SNP – which is broadly supportive of the changes – and Alba which is calling for the effort to be paused.
Suzanne McLaughlin, a member of WFI’s national committee and feminist campaigner, told The National the person responsible was trying to cash in on the “newsworthiness” of the organisation because of the recent trial.
She said: “We’re furious. We are a progressive and inclusive organisation and that includes trans women.
“Not every single woman who heard what happened yesterday and was Googling WFI will know all the ins and outs.
“The very thought that any woman could go to that page and think that WFI are saying those types of things is abhorrent."
A spokeswoman for WFI said the domain name purchase meant Alba could “benefit from our decade of activism, whilst putting forward values that are different to ours”.
READ MORE: Alba reject John Curtice's verdict that party 'must be over' after council vote
An Alba spokesperson said: “Alba Party do not own the domain in question but it is no surprise that women that support independence also support Alba Party and have chosen to refer other women to one of our statements on Gender Recognition.
“Alba Party is made up of many members, like the majority of the Scottish public, that have concerns over the Scottish Government’s proposals to remove current safeguards in place within the Gender Recognition Act - which will make it much easier for any person born male to identify as a woman and then gain access to female-only spaces.
“At the moment anyone that expresses concerns over the Government’s policy aims, particularly women, face a very toxic and abusive response.
“The Scottish Government has failed miserably to listen to all views and they have refused to accept that the rights of women and people that identify as trans fundamentally conflict in their proposals.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel