BORIS Johnson immediately jumped to culture war talking points to dodge questions on whether he backs a windfall tax on oil and gas giants.
The Prime Minister was told his government had failed to offer a coherent position on calls to impose levies on energy firms after Tory frontbenchers had given conflicting opinions on the policy.
But Johnson ducked when Keir Starmer questioned his position, saying the leader of the opposition could not “define what a woman was”.
Starmer said: “A one-off tax on huge oil and tax profits would raise billions of pounds, cutting energy bills across the country.
READ MORE: Inverness to Russia flight WAS approved by Tory government in defiance of ban, SNP claim
"The Chancellor rightly says there are two camps on this. You are either for it or you’re against it.
“But which camp did the Chancellor put himself in?
"He says neither. Well, I’m in favour of it. The question for the Prime Minister is: is he for it? Is he against it? Or is he sitting on the fence like his Chancellor?”
Johnson refused to directly answer the question, instead saying: “I just remind the House the right honourable gentleman struggled to define what a woman was. He couldn’t make up his mind on that point.”
He said the Tories were “not in principle in favour of higher taxation”.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak told MPs the measure, which would see energy companies making record profits during the cost of living crisis, was not off the table and could be considered if firms did not sufficiently invest their profits back into the economy.
Johnson added: “What we want to do is take a sensible approach governed by the impact on investment and jobs and that is the test of a strong economy and it is by having a strong economy that we will be able to look after people as we have done during Covid and and as we will do in the aftershocks of Covid.
“Nothing could be more transparent from this exchange than their lust to raise taxes.”
The SNP abstained when Labour last put the policy to a vote, saying the measure could result in divestment from the north east of Scotland where the oil and gas sector employs thousands.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel