The SNP are campaigning for “higher prices” for Scottish whisky, Jacob Rees-Mogg has suggested.
The claim came after the Cabinet Office minister was asked by SNP MP Martin Docherty-Hughes whether the Government would seek to protect whisky prices from cheap imports, as the UK searches for new trade partners.
West Dunbartonshire MP Docherty-Hughes asked: “In terms of open trade can he make some clarification about friendly nations? Does that include India shipping cheap Indian whisky to the United Kingdom?”
Rees-Mogg, whose ministerial responsibilities include “Brexit opportunities”, replied: “It will have to be a risk-based assessment. If he can say that it is dangerous, or it is poisonous, or it is breaking a trademark.
READ MORE: ‘We were left in the dark over this Brexit shambles’
“Do we really have a Scotsman in the House who doesn’t like his whisky to be cheap? Does he want to pay higher prices for whisky?
“Is he calling for the good people of Scotland – this is news Mr Deputy Speaker, a newsflash.
“I hope PA is reporting it carefully along with Hansard. The SNP want higher prices for whisky, higher prices for your evening tipple, Deputy Speaker.
“Well I look forward to that being a good and successful slogan at the next general election: ‘Vote SNP for higher whisky prices’.”
Rees-Mogg had earlier agreed with the sentiment of a speech made by Labour MP Hilary Benn (Leeds Central) about post-Brexit trade.
Labour former minister Benn urged both the EU and the UK to stop “squabbling” over the Northern Ireland Protocol and “sort it out”.
READ MORE: Scottish whisky sets new world record at auction
As he concluded the debate on the Queen’s Speech, The SNP are campaigning for “higher prices” for Scottish whisky, Jacob Rees-Mogg has suggested Rees-Mogg said: “We may not like the EU, we may not think it is the best construct, we may not want to belong to it, but we don’t think they have suddenly become rabid.
“That is why I was delighted to be able to announced in April that remaining import controls on EU goods will no longer be introduced… and this isn’t a delay, this is a change in policy because we recognise that goods produced in other parts of the world, not just the EU, can be produced safely and therefore it makes sense to have unilateral recognition if others won’t give us neutral recognition.”
He added the Government would “see how far we can extend that with other friendly nations that have high standards” with the aim of cutting costs for consumers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel