SCOTS should be given the choice of independence because Boris Johnson is a “radical” Prime Minister who is going to “dramatically change” the UK anyway, a former SNP MP has insisted.
Speaking on the BBC’s Debate Night show, former North East Fife MP Stephen Gethins said people should be given the chance to debate the country’s future, given how much the union is being transformed in the wake of Brexit and under the premiership of Johnson.
An audience member had asked what lessons could be learnt from the “economic disaster” caused by Brexit if Scotland were to become independent, and what could it do differently.
Tory MSP Jeremy Balfour argued Brexit showed how difficult it would be for Scotland to leave the UK and claimed it was not the time for an independence referendum.
But Gethins insisted the fallout of Brexit was not a reason Scotland should stay in the union, suggesting there was “no such thing as the status quo” anymore.
He said: “People in Scotland have overwhelmingly backed a party that wants independence. If the Scottish parliamentary election last year had been a Westminster election, in terms of constituency seats, the SNP would’ve won 580 out of the 650 seats.
READ MORE: SNP slam Anas Sarwar over Labour's 'dirty deals' with Tories
“Now, it's proportional thankfully so you get a more proportional parliament and you can have that broader depth of debate but I’m not sure you move politics on by saying to people, regardless of how you vote, you’ve got it wrong and we know what’s best.
“I actually don’t think that serves the Union. I’m not here to stand up for the Union but I think what you need is I think you need that broad debate.
“I think people who support independence have got some very serious questions to answer but actually the union has changed dramatically as a result of Brexit. Boris Johnson is a radical Prime Minister who is changing the UK, radically.
“There is no such thing as the status quo anymore. You’re going to get dramatic change in your situation anyway so why not give people a choice of whether that dramatic change is within the union or with independence?”
Balfour said: “I think we are in an economically difficult place and I think for us to be talking about independence, about moving away from our largest market, it’s just absolutely not the time to do it.
“The Brexit experience has shown us how difficult it is to divide from a market that was important to us in Scotland, the market of the UK is vital for us.”
READ MORE: UK’s bid to conceal Union poll ‘threatens’ Freedom of Information Act, says Tommy Sheppard
Gethins argued the Brexit process should show people the importance of having constructive debates, citing how the UK Government “rushed through” triggering Article 50 in the wake of a Leave vote.
He claimed the Westminster Government did not understand how damaging Brexit would be, but their “mistake” doesn't mean Scotland should steer clear of independence.
He added: “I think the first thing you can learn from the Brexit process is the value of productive and respectful debate.
“It was rushed through. I remember I put down an amendment saying you shouldn’t be having this six weeks afterwards, that was your first mistake.
“And then all of a sudden you’ve left the EU without, I’m afraid to say, your colleagues at Westminster really understanding what the EU did or the value in the single market which now contributes to the energy and food and drink crisis.
“On the point of “oh well, it was so terrible that means we can’t have independence”, what you’re arguing there is, we’ve made a really bad mistake here and we made such a bad mistake we’ve got to stick with it.”
SNP MP John Nicolson praised Gethins for his contribution to the programme.
"Really refreshing to hear a contributor allowed to give a detailed and thoughtful answer on national television, developing an argument, without interruption from the chair," he noted on Twitter.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel