THE SNP have said the partygate investigation must be published without any “hint of interference” after it emerged Boris Johnson held a “secret” meeting with report author Sue Gray.
The Prime Minister is under pressure to explain the talks with the senior civil servant, who is this week expected to publish her report – which has been repeatedly described as independent.
It is understood the pair met at least once to give an update on the document’s progress while it was being drafted.
A Whitehall source is said to have claimed that its contents were not discussed at any point, but the exact nature of the talks remains unclear.
The BBC reported that the discussions touched on whether photos would be revealed to the public, and that Gray initiated the meeting “to clarify her intentions” for what would happen once the police investigation concluded.
However, a spokesman for the Gray inquiry disputed this account of events.
They confirmed that a meeting took place, but added they would not characterise the talks in that way.
READ MORE: Tory civil war flares up as MSP insists Boris Johnson must resign
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said the “Downing Street briefing war” was a sideshow to “the one thing that people actually want to know – the truth”.
He added: “We know we won’t get it from Boris Johnson – who can be trusted as much as a fox in a hen house – so the Sue Gray report must be published in full immediately and without any hint of interference from the Prime Minister or his team.
“Let’s not forget the heart of this scandal – the public stayed at home, following the rules, while the Prime Minister and his Downing Street staff partied.”
Around 30 people, including Johnson, are being contacted by the Cabinet Office to warn them of the contents of the document ahead of its publication. It is thought that most of the Cabinet Office letters were sent out on Thursday, as the Metropolitan Police concluded its investigation into lockdown breaches in Downing Street and across Whitehall.
It has been reported that two civil servants had indicated they were considering legal action to prevent themselves being identified in the report.
Earlier, Johnson had insisted he would not seek to block names appearing in the document, and said he was “looking forward” to seeing its contents “pretty soon”.
Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, called on the Prime Minister to “urgently explain” why the “secret meeting” had taken place.
She said public confidence in the process had already been “depleted”, and people “deserve to know the truth”.
“The Sue Gray report must be published in full and with all accompanying evidence,” she added.
Liberal Democrat MP Christine Jardine also called on Johnson to throw light on the meeting, saying: Any whiff of a stitch-up would make an absolute mockery of the report.”
A No 10 spokesperson said: “The Prime Minister commissioned the investigation led by Sue Gray and has been clear throughout that it should be completely independent.
“As he reiterated again today, the decision on what and when to publish rests entirely with the investigation team and he will respond in Parliament once it concludes.”
The Met Police issued 126 fines over gatherings in Downing Street and Whitehall, including to Johnson, his wife Carrie and Rishi Sunak.
.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel