MORE time was spent in the House of Commons in a “sycophantic” discussion of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee than the cost-of-living crisis on Thursday, The National can reveal.
In a general debate noting the 70th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth’s time on the throne, MPs took just over two hours to recount occasions they had met the monarch and what they viewed as their relationship with the 96-year-old.
Few MPs stayed for the full length of the debate, which was kicked off by Boris Johnson and Keir Starmer - including the Prime Minister and the Labour leader, who left during the proceedings.
READ MORE: Labour attack SNP as Rishi Sunak unveils partygate cover-up measures
This is in contrast to the hour and 40 minutes spent discussing a new package of measures introduced to ease the cost-of-living crisis.
Among those to give accounts of interactions with the Queen over the years were former SNP MP Margaret Ferrier, who now sits as an independent, the SNP’s deputy Westminster leader Kirsten Oswald (below), former Prime Minister Theresa May and the father of the House Peter Bottomley.
No MPs referenced the dwindling support for the monarchy, the cash for honours scandal circling Prince Charles, the allegations of racism pointed at the Royal household by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle or Prince Andrew paying money to a woman who has accused him of sexual assault.
No mention was made of what will happen to the monarchy or the public support it currently enjoys in England and Wales in the event of the Queen’s death, given the gap in popularity between her and her successor.
David Linden, the SNP MP for Glasgow East, did not attend the debate and branded the monarchy as an “outdated relic that has no place in the 21st century”.
He told The National: “I don’t think anybody would think that answer to the cost of living crisis is a bloated royal family that most people in Scotland would struggle to identify with.
“The toyal gamily in particular would struggle to understand the challenges that many of my constituents are facing.
“Democratically, it’s an embarrassment to the UK and I don’t get involved in these debates which are, at best, sycophantic.
READ MORE: Tories cave in to windfall tax demand as PM tries to shift focus from partygate
“If the British hovernment put half as much effort into tackling the cost-of-living crisis as they do with the pomp and ceremony, then we’d all be in a better place.”
Johnson said his meetings with the Queen were “always immensely comforting”.
He added: “No monarch, by her efforts and dedication and achievement, better deserves the attribute of greatness. And for me, she is already Elizabeth The Great.”
Parliament took around an hour and 40 minutes to discuss the measures introduced by the Chancellor – including his statement outlining the package – which included windfall tax on oil and gas giants and doubling the energy bill support payment to all households while changing it from a repayable loan to a grant.
Labour and the SNP have said the measures still do not go far enough, highlighting a lack of action on tackling tax dodgers and pointing out many measures did not deal with the potential for the crisis to last into next year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel